The Role of Corporates in Governing Carbon Dioxide Removal: Outlining a Research Agenda

Abstract

With 1,500 companies now estimated to have set net zero targets, corporate engagement with carbon dioxide removal (CDR) has gained substantial momentum. Yet despite the corporate sector becoming a key domain of CDR decision-making, corporates have not received research attention as influential actors in the governance of CDR. This paper provides a perspective on how corporates influence and enact de facto governance of CDR. We collate a preliminary evidence base regarding possible modes of CDR governance by corporates. Focusing on voluntary corporate engagement with CDR, we examine how and why firm-level decision-making takes place, and interrogate the implications of such activity. We find that the current literature focuses on techno-economic attributes of CDR solutions as drivers of corporate engagement; however, the ability for corporates to formulate a (business) case for engaging with CDR is potentially shaped by a broader array of financial and non-financial factors that are currently overlooked. This gives corporates the influence to define what and how to govern, an inherently “political act.” We finally highlight possible lenses for future research, noting lessons to be drawn from climate justice, anticipatory governance, responsible innovation, and futures literatures. These could provide a deepened understanding of the dynamics and implications of current de facto CDR governance, and allow this to be challenged where appropriate. Ultimately, without awareness and oversight of how CDR is being governed in the real world, policy and governance research may not be successful in driving us toward desired net zero futures.

Public perceptions on carbon removal from focus groups in 22 countries

“…These concerns reflect numerous warnings from the expert literature: feeding hype and false expectations 72 , justifying delay of industrial decarbonization 73 , generating precarious local economies around carbon stocks 22 , and perversely shaping government support 74 . There is a need to evaluate how corporate actors are constructing commitments towards Net Zero 1 , potentially conflicting certification schemes 75 , environmental, social, and industry disclosure standards, more rigorous regulations tailored to national circumstances, and transnational issues of carbon exports and technology transfer.…”

Geochemical Negative Emissions Technologies: Part II. Roadmap

“…Today, demand for geochemical NETs is generated primarily through voluntary carbon markets and corporate commitments (Battersby et al, 2022). Demand for durable forms of carbon removal has been increasing, with the most significant recent commitment being the $925 million advance market commitment by Frontier (2022).…”