2015
DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2015.1116969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of corporate governance in shaping accruals manipulation prior to acquisitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
14
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Such firms with weak financial standing can be gauged based on their cash flow position which is considered as the main trustworthy indicator relied by most investors subsequent to era of accounting debacles (Mulford & Comiskey, 2005). Furthermore Lehmann (2016) found that firms with strong corporate governance were aggressively involved in earnings manipulation compared to firms with weak governance due to corporate governance role which pressure management to act in shareholders' interest. In addition, similar case can be observed in Satyam scandal where despite being awarded with numerous accolades for outstanding governance and corporate accountability, its management was caught committing financial statements fraud (Agrawal, 2009).…”
Section: Binary Logistic Regression Results For Corporate Governanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such firms with weak financial standing can be gauged based on their cash flow position which is considered as the main trustworthy indicator relied by most investors subsequent to era of accounting debacles (Mulford & Comiskey, 2005). Furthermore Lehmann (2016) found that firms with strong corporate governance were aggressively involved in earnings manipulation compared to firms with weak governance due to corporate governance role which pressure management to act in shareholders' interest. In addition, similar case can be observed in Satyam scandal where despite being awarded with numerous accolades for outstanding governance and corporate accountability, its management was caught committing financial statements fraud (Agrawal, 2009).…”
Section: Binary Logistic Regression Results For Corporate Governanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.1.4.4. F&A stock-for-stock e governança corporativa Lehmann (2016) investigou o papel da governança corporativa no EM por accruals antes de F&A stock-for-stock. Em contraste com as alegações comuns de que governança corporativa forte restringe o EM por accruals, Lehmann (2016) mostra que os adquirentes com forte governança se envolvem mais agressivamente na manipulação para aumento de lucro do que aqueles com fraca governança.…”
Section: Fanda Stock-for-stock E Desdobramento De Açõesunclassified
“…F&A stock-for-stock e governança corporativa Lehmann (2016) investigou o papel da governança corporativa no EM por accruals antes de F&A stock-for-stock. Em contraste com as alegações comuns de que governança corporativa forte restringe o EM por accruals, Lehmann (2016) mostra que os adquirentes com forte governança se envolvem mais agressivamente na manipulação para aumento de lucro do que aqueles com fraca governança. Os resultados são robustos aos diferentes modelos de accruals discricionários, às diferenças na estrutura de crescimento da empresa, às variáveis de controle, a um grupo de controle de 100% de adquirentes por meio de caixa, aos retornos anormais de longo prazo (buy-and-hold) e a possíveis problemas de seleção amostral.…”
Section: Fanda Stock-for-stock E Desdobramento De Açõesunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data show that, if a researcher wishes to investigate the Italian capital market, which is the smallest in our study but one of the largest in the EU, they will estimate AAs for only 43% of the potentially available observations using the 2SICy approach. In response, either an industry classification wider than the two-digit SIC code is used to estimate the accruals models cross-sectionally (e.g., Athanasakou et al, 2009;Gore et al, 2007;Lapointe-Antunes, Cormier, Magnan, & Gay-Angers, 2006;Lehmann, 2016;Sáenz González & García-meca, 2014;Saleh & Ahmed, 2005;Simpson, 2013;Van Tendeloo & Vanstraelen, 2008) or alternative techniques are employed to identify AAs (e.g., Capalbo, Frino, Mollica, & Palumbo, 2014;DeFond & Park, 2001;Francis & Wang, 2008;Ittonen, Johnstone, & Myllymäki, 2015;Jansen, Ramnath, & Yohn, 2012;Zerni, Haapamäki, Järvinen, & Niemi, 2012).…”
Section: Industry-based Estimation Approaches Versus the MIX Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%