2017
DOI: 10.1007/s41464-017-0033-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Contract Types for Employees’ Public Service Motivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study contributes to the existing research by analyzing how civic virtue relates to public sector employment in addition to other relevant motives (altruism, risk aversion, laziness and financial motivation). We extend previous work on the role of civic virtue for public sector employment (Grund and Thommes, 2017;Luechinger et al, 2010) by considering a large set of motives in a large dataset. Only employers who understand the entire set of motives of their employees will be able to attract and retain suitable individuals and to design appropriate incentive structures (Delfgaauw and Dur, 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This study contributes to the existing research by analyzing how civic virtue relates to public sector employment in addition to other relevant motives (altruism, risk aversion, laziness and financial motivation). We extend previous work on the role of civic virtue for public sector employment (Grund and Thommes, 2017;Luechinger et al, 2010) by considering a large set of motives in a large dataset. Only employers who understand the entire set of motives of their employees will be able to attract and retain suitable individuals and to design appropriate incentive structures (Delfgaauw and Dur, 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to altruism, the relationship between civic virtue and public sector employment has barely been investigated; two exceptions are Grund and Thommes () and Luechinger et al . ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations