2019
DOI: 10.1515/lingvan-2018-0069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of context in sociolinguistic perception

Abstract: Previous research demonstrates that listeners make social inferences about people based on how they speak, and that these inferences vary depending on the linguistic and social context. An open question is exactly how contextual enrichment (i.e. information about the speaker and speaking situation) comes to influence sociolinguistic perception. This paper addresses this question by analyzing data from 10 perception experiments investigating three different linguistic phenomena: number agreement in existential … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that an increase in contextual enrichment correlates with a corresponding reliance on specific status characteristics to the exclusion of diffuse ones, like accent. Thus, while the findings of the current study may have revealed more nuanced effects of accent bias than in prior work, we argue that this discrepancy results from our examination of attitudes within a specific professional context and from the ways in which context interacts with attitude formation more generally (see, e.g., Cargile, Giles, Ryan & Bradac 1994;Gawronski, Ye, Rydell & De Houwer 2014;Hilton & Jeong 2019;Levon & Ye 2020).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We suggest that an increase in contextual enrichment correlates with a corresponding reliance on specific status characteristics to the exclusion of diffuse ones, like accent. Thus, while the findings of the current study may have revealed more nuanced effects of accent bias than in prior work, we argue that this discrepancy results from our examination of attitudes within a specific professional context and from the ways in which context interacts with attitude formation more generally (see, e.g., Cargile, Giles, Ryan & Bradac 1994;Gawronski, Ye, Rydell & De Houwer 2014;Hilton & Jeong 2019;Levon & Ye 2020).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…We focus on this particular context since we are interested in exploring whether accent may impede social mobility and professional advancement. As prior work in both linguistics and psychology has demonstrated, attitudes to language and other forms of socially meaningful practice are contextually situated, such that the evaluation of a behavior in one context does not necessarily apply in another (Gawronski, Ye, Rydell & De Houwer 2014;Nayakakuppam, Priester, Kwon, Donovan & Petty 2018;Hilton & Jeong 2019;Levon & Ye 2020). It is therefore not possible to assume that attitudes to language in a professional context will match those elicited in a more general (or "neutral") context (Ajzen 1991(Ajzen , 2005Campbell-Kibler 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we mentioned, our results are reminiscent of those found by Hilton &Jeong (2019), andBeltrama et al (2022): results involving the interpretation of sociolinguistic phenomena obtained in experiments with minimal context weaken or even disappear when the context becomes more detailed. We have named this phenomenon contextual dilution, and we suggest that it arises from how people process the information in the texts that they read.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Secondly, context effects do not emerge consistently across the two experiments. To some extent these differences likely reflect differing methodological choices with respect to how the context was represented, and the relative weight of contextual content vs. instances of the variable under investigation (see Hilton & Jeong 2019 for related findings). But these effects could also indicate that respondents were sensitive to subtle aspects of the test scenarios beyond those reflecting the intended manipulations, calling for further research into how the way in which contextual information is represented experimentally affects the social perception of a particular variant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%