The role of computer software in the analysis of qualitative data: efficient clerk, research assistant or Trojan horse?

Abstract

In the last 15 years there has been a proliferation of computer software packages designed to facilitate qualitative data analysis. The programs can be classified, according to function, into a number of broad categories such as: text retrieval; text base management; coding and retrieval; code-based theory building; and conceptual-network building. The programs vary enormously in the extent to which they can facilitate the diverse analytical processes involved. The decision to use computer software to aid analysis in a particular project may be influenced by a number of factors, such as the nature of the data and the researcher's preferred approach to data analysis which will have as its basis certain epistemological and ontological assumptions. This paper illustrates the way in which a package called NUD.IST facilitated analysis where grounded theory methods of data analysis were also extensively used. While highlighting the many benefits that ensued, the paper illustrates the limitations of such programs. The purpose of this paper is to encourage researchers contemplating the use of computer software to consider carefully the possible consequences of their decision and to be aware that the use of such programs can alter the nature of the analytical process in unexpected and perhaps unwanted ways. The role of the Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis (CAQDAS) Networking Project, in providing up-to-date information and support for researchers contemplating the use of software, is discussed.

Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience

“…This is an important distinction, as reliance on computer analysis of data has a significant potential to produce erroneous results. The literature suggests that although software programs may save time, it is not clear if this adds to the analysis or detracts from it by distancing the researcher from the data through the mediation of computer, as the familiarity with the data engendered through repeated handling, reading and re-reading is an integral part of the analytical process [42,44,45]. Although more time consuming and a bit old fashioned, these authors still prefer hand coding as we feel it provides a more organic emersion and understanding of the data.…”

Multi - Girl - Culture : An Ethnography of Doing Identity

“…I used MaxQDA 12 , a computer programme designed to facilitate coding. Discussions about Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Systems (CAQDAS) question if CAQDAS improves or harms the quality of the analysis (Fielding & Lee, 1998;Kelle, 1997;Marshall, 2002;Morison & Moir, 1998). Opponents fear computers bring positivist assumptions and a lack of creativity, whereas proponents celebrate the rigour and speed that computers add to the coding process.…”

Exploring the Migrant Experience in Small Business Activities in Auckland: A Case Study of African Migrants

“…Waldinger et al (1990) identified the migrant experience of only low-paid jobs and discrimination as principal factors that compel migrants to self-employment. Migrant small business owners often face challenging experiences in business management and finance (Collins, 2003;Gaskill, Auken, Howard, & Manning, 1993;Morrison & Moir, 1998;Ram & Deakins, 1996).…”