The Role of Community Cohesion in Older Adults During the COVID-19 Epidemic: Cross-sectional Study

Abstract

Background The community environment plays a vital role in the health of older adults. During the COVID-19 epidemic, older adults, who were considered the most impacted and most vulnerable social group, were confined to their homes during the implementation of management and control measures for the epidemic. In such situations, older adults may have to contend with a lack of resources and experience anxiety. Therefore, identifying the environmental factors that are beneficial for their physical and mental health is critical. Objective This study aimed to assess the association between community cohesion and the physical and mental health of older adults and to identify the related community services and environmental factors that may promote community cohesion. Methods This community-based cross-sectional study was designed during the COVID-19 epidemic. A multistage sampling method was applied to this study. A total of 2036 participants aged ≥60 years were sampled from 27 locations in China. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews. The neighborhood cohesion instrument consisting of scales on 3 dimensions was used to assess community cohesion. Self-efficacy and life satisfaction, cognitive function and depression, and community services and environmental factors were also measured using standard instruments. Statistical analyses were restricted to 99.07% (2017/2036) of the participants. Separate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the association among community cohesion and physical and mental health factors, related community services, and environmental factors among older adults. Results The results showed that high levels of community cohesion were associated with good self-perceived health status and life satisfaction (odds ratio [OR] 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.59 and OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.15-1.27, respectively) and high levels of self-efficacy and psychological resilience (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.13 and OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06, respectively). The length of stay in the community and the level of physical activity were positively associated with community cohesion scores, whereas the education level was negatively associated with community cohesion scores (P=.009). Community cohesion was also associated with low levels of depression and high levels of cognitive function. Community cohesion was significantly associated with community services and environmental factors on 4 dimensions. High levels of community cohesion were associated with transportation services and rehabilitation equipment rental services as well as high levels of satisfaction with community physicians’ technical expertise and community waste disposal (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.87-5.28; OR 3.62, 95% CI 2.38-5.52; OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.08-1.73; and OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01-1.50, respectively). Conclusions Community cohesion was found to be associated with the physical and mental health of older adults. Our research suggests that enhancing community services and environmental resources may be an effective strategy to increase community cohesion during major infectious disease epidemics.

Intervención participativa comunitaria: necesidades de salud de las personas mayores durante el período de la pandemia por COVID-19

“…En el diagnóstico participativo, se encontró que las personas ancianas valoran el vínculo con los clubes de personas su misma edad, las juntas de vecinos y vecinas, y los centros de salud, lo que evidencia lo importante que es la socialización en este grupo de población. La evidencia demuestra que el entorno comunitario interviene en la salud física y mental de las personas mayores y que un alto nivel de cohesión comunitaria se relaciona con una mejor percepción de salud y satisfacción con la vida 6 .…”

The effect of training medical students in the community area in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic in China: a community-based study

“…Face-to-face structured interviews were conducted by Master of Public Health students who used a standardized interview protocol and a set of responses for recording the responses of participants. The interview time was approximately 45–60 min for most participants, and the interviewer suggested that elderly people who feel tired may take a rest [ 33 ].…”

The spatial effect of digital economy on public psychological resilience during the diffusive crisis

“…Psychological resilience, also known as psychological elasticity, refers to a stable psychological characteristic that reduces, adapts to, or even overcomes the negative impact of sudden events on mental health ( 2 ). The existence of psychological resilience enables the public to self-regulate and cope with the emotional turmoil incurred by the diffusive crisis, which is crucial for maintaining mental health after such events ( 3 , 4 ). From the perspectives of safety informatics and information economics, the key to resolving diffusive crisis lies in information management, and the prevention of uncertain risks also depends on the extent of available information.…”