2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2146983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Common Shocks for Small Open Economies between 1900 and 2006: A Structural Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…49 It may be argued that the measures of government expenditure used above do not incorporate direct transfers from the government to households and that these can be an alternative mechanism for channeling resources from the commodity sector. 50 In this case, however, our model would be isomorphic to this case as households are the ultimate recipients of revenues from the commodity sector.…”
Section: The Role Of Fiscal Policy: a Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…49 It may be argued that the measures of government expenditure used above do not incorporate direct transfers from the government to households and that these can be an alternative mechanism for channeling resources from the commodity sector. 50 In this case, however, our model would be isomorphic to this case as households are the ultimate recipients of revenues from the commodity sector.…”
Section: The Role Of Fiscal Policy: a Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further empirical evidence for a larger number of countries against the hypothesis that the reaction of government spending in a commodity-exporting economy amplifies the effect of commodity prices on the business cycles is presented Cespedes and Velasco (2013) 50. There is evidence that during the previous decade, which coincided with the commodity boom period, large-scale cash transfer programs to poor households were put in place by goverments in these economies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assertion is supported by the serial correlations reported in Figure 12 where, once more, we correlate country commodity price indices with economic activity across EMEs, except that this time we com- It may be argued that the measures of government expenditure used above do not incorporate direct transfers from the government to households and that these can be an alternative mechanism for channeling resources from the commodity sector. 50 In this case, however, our model would be isomorphic to this case as households are the ultimate recipients of revenues from the commodity sector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%