Teacher Involvement in High-Stakes Language Testing 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77177-9_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Classroom Teachers in Standard Setting and Benchmarking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large percentage of respondents believed that the training had an impact not only on assessment-related tasks, but also on their general teaching practice. This is in line with findings from similar studies in contexts in which training in assessment was also made available to teachers on a large scale, such as in the case of the Austrian Matura reform project (Konrad et al 2018), which found that language assessment training for teachers led to a positive impact on classroom testing and a deeper understanding of the standard to be measured. Our results indicated that the teachers mostly appreciated how the training had helped widen their views by offering them a different perspective of their work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A large percentage of respondents believed that the training had an impact not only on assessment-related tasks, but also on their general teaching practice. This is in line with findings from similar studies in contexts in which training in assessment was also made available to teachers on a large scale, such as in the case of the Austrian Matura reform project (Konrad et al 2018), which found that language assessment training for teachers led to a positive impact on classroom testing and a deeper understanding of the standard to be measured. Our results indicated that the teachers mostly appreciated how the training had helped widen their views by offering them a different perspective of their work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%