The Role of Cities in the Sharing Economy: Exploring Modes of Governance in Urban Sharing Practices

Abstract

Cities have for a long time been key actors in sustainable urban development, and in recent times, also for the sharing economy, as they provide a fertile breeding ground for various sharing initiatives. While some of these initiatives build on existing practices and infrastructures such as public libraries and repair workshops, others require the involvement of private companies, as in the case of car sharing. The sharing economy might therefore require a significant reinterpretation of the role of local governments, businesses and citizens, which in turn might imply a complex re-organisation of governing. This article will explore what potential roles cities might have in governing the sharing economy. Four Swedish cities serve as case studies for this purpose: Stockholm, Gothenburg, Malmö and Umeå. City data was collected primarily through qualitative means of investigation, including workshops, interviews and desk research. In Malmö, additional participatory observations were conducted on the testbed Sege Park. Results were analysed with a framework developed for understanding the various governing roles for cities in the sharing economy. Three dominant modes of governing were identified and discussed: governing by provision and authority; governing by partnership and enabling; and governing through volunteering. The four cities made use of all three governing modes, although with a primary focus on governing by authority and governing through partnership. When characterised by governing through volunteering, projects were always initiated by the city, but then run formally by an NGO. While all governing modes may have a role and a purpose in the sharing economy, it is still important that cities reflect upon what are their actual implications. Risks include a collaborative governing mode out-competing some businesses, for example, and a self-governing mode reducing the action space of the volunteer sector.

The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence

“…Relatedly, Mont et al (2020) state that sharing in cities is 'particularly promising' from a sustainability standpoint. Indeed, urban features including high concentrations of economic activity, human population, consumption, and existing infrastructure, are thought to make urban areas exceptionally 'fertile breeding grounds' for sharing initiatives and innovations (Palm et al 2019. Yet despite much interest in sharing as an urban phenomenon, as evident by the growing body of work focusing on urban governess of sharing activities (Davidson and Infranca 2016, Bernardi and Diamantini 2018, Akande et al 2020 the ways in which urban form affects sharing networks and the subsequent environmental impacts of sharing needs further exploration.…”

The influence of COVID‐19 on modes of governance for climate change—Expert views from the Netherlands and the UK

“…This links to the concept of polycentric governance—advocated by Ostrom (2010) and Cole (2011)—in which a sub‐global approach is encouraged, involving multiple centres of semi‐autonomous decision‐making. Conversely, some authors have examined the application of modes of governance at the city scale (Palm et al, 2019). On the issue of level of governance, we clarify that our study concentrates on modes of governance operating at the national level.…”

Achieving the Circular Economy: Exploring the Role of Local Governments, Business and Citizens in an Urban Context

“…In the paper of Palm, Södergren and Bocken, "The Role of Cities in the Sharing Economy: Exploring Modes of Governance in Urban Sharing Practices" [1], the potential roles cities might have in governing the sharing economy is explored. Cities have provided space for various sharing initiatives such as car sharing, public libraries and repair workshops.…”