1953
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1953.tb00803.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Cholinesterase at the Myoneural Junction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1954
1954
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage inhibition of acetylcholinesterase sites in tissues can be determined by measurement of the acetylcholinesterase activity of tissue homogenates (so-called total acetylcholinesterase assay). Studies of the relationship between enzyme inhibition, determined in this way, and tetanic fade (Berry & Evans, 1951;Barnes & Duff, 1953) have shown that only a very small percentage of the acetylcholinesterase sites at the neuromuscular junction is required for a normal muscle response to nerve stimulation at 0007-1188/79/060323-07 S01.00 higher frequencies. Subsequently, Koelle & Steiner (1956) and Mclsaac & Koelle (1959) provided evidence that only a fraction of all the acetylcholinesterase sites at a cholinergic junction is involved in the hydrolysis of acetylcholine released from the nerve terminals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The percentage inhibition of acetylcholinesterase sites in tissues can be determined by measurement of the acetylcholinesterase activity of tissue homogenates (so-called total acetylcholinesterase assay). Studies of the relationship between enzyme inhibition, determined in this way, and tetanic fade (Berry & Evans, 1951;Barnes & Duff, 1953) have shown that only a very small percentage of the acetylcholinesterase sites at the neuromuscular junction is required for a normal muscle response to nerve stimulation at 0007-1188/79/060323-07 S01.00 higher frequencies. Subsequently, Koelle & Steiner (1956) and Mclsaac & Koelle (1959) provided evidence that only a fraction of all the acetylcholinesterase sites at a cholinergic junction is involved in the hydrolysis of acetylcholine released from the nerve terminals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.1.1.7) prolongs the postsynaptic action of acetylcholine and this renders striated muscle unable to maintain a contraction in response to nerve stimulation at higher frequencies (tetanic fade, Wedensky inhibition). It also reduces the concentration of exogenous acetylcholine which produces neuromuscular block by postsynaptic depolarization (Burgen & Hobbiger, 1951;Barnes & Duff, 1953). The percentage inhibition of acetylcholinesterase sites in tissues can be determined by measurement of the acetylcholinesterase activity of tissue homogenates (so-called total acetylcholinesterase assay).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these paralysing compounds are themselves anticholinesterases. Barnes and Duff (1953) have recently shown that inhibition of cholinesterase per se does not block neuromuscular transmission. Our evidence, too, suggests, that the paralysing action of these cholinesterase inhibitors is independent of the inhibition of the enzyme-whereas, in a series of compounds with a polymethylene chain uniting two isoquinoline groups, curariform activity paralleled inhibition of the true enzyme (Smith, Pelikan, Maramba, and Unna, 1953).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of this, substantial reversal of the twitch potentiation occured within 1 h of removal of paraoxon from the organ bath, which, if a marked decline of twitch potentiation had occurred, involved a transient phase of further potentiation. Thus, as is the case with the tetanic fade produced by the organophosphate anticholinesterases (Berry & Lovatt-Evans, 1951;Barnes & Duff, 1953;Fleisher, Hansa, Kilos & Harrison, 1960;Van der Meer & Wolthuis, 1965;Heffron & Hobbiger, 1979), small changes in the level of enzyme inhibition can produce marked changes in the muscle response to nerve stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the rate of onset of twitch potentiation was delayed and the subsequent decline was reduced or abolished. Spontaneous muscle fasciculations accompany twitch potentiation produced by paraoxon (Barnes & Duff, 1953) and DFP (Van der Meer & Meeter, 1956) in rat diavhraam t,reoarations. These fasciculations are thought to be due to antidromic action potentials (ADF) being initiated at one nerve terminal and transmitted to other terminals of the same neurone, thus giving rise to repetitive action potentials in the muscle fibres contained within the same motor unit (Feng & Li, 1941;Webb & Bowman, 1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%