2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of choice provision in academic dishonesty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students rated the extent to which they agreed with each item on a 5‐point Likert scale ranging from not at all true (1) to extremely true (5). We selected items from these particular scales to assess need satisfaction on the three needs because they are relatively brief, and are regularly used in school‐based self‐determination theory research (e.g., Patall & Leach, ; Patall et al., ; Reeve & Lee, ), and because previous studies have established the validity and reliability of all scales for cross‐sectional research (Reeve & Jang, ; Reeve & Sickenius, ; Reeve et al., ). We conducted multilevel factor analyses and reliability analyses to confirm that our abbreviated measures were appropriate for our daily context.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students rated the extent to which they agreed with each item on a 5‐point Likert scale ranging from not at all true (1) to extremely true (5). We selected items from these particular scales to assess need satisfaction on the three needs because they are relatively brief, and are regularly used in school‐based self‐determination theory research (e.g., Patall & Leach, ; Patall et al., ; Reeve & Lee, ), and because previous studies have established the validity and reliability of all scales for cross‐sectional research (Reeve & Jang, ; Reeve & Sickenius, ; Reeve et al., ). We conducted multilevel factor analyses and reliability analyses to confirm that our abbreviated measures were appropriate for our daily context.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, when students engage in academic dishonesty, they govern their own behavior and shape their education-related experiences themselves. This may enhance students' autonomy (Patall & Leach, 2015), which may help them regain their lost sense of self. Similarly, the amount of resources needed to cope with the stress of diminished classroom connectedness will put pressure on students' remaining resources, which may make them change their academic performance strategy, such as using unauthorized help to clear exams.…”
Section: The Mediating Role Of Classroom Connectednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the massification of HE increasingly disconnects individual tutors from their own students (Allais, 2014), hope for the detection of outsourced assignments is seen to rest more on machine-based solutions than on human intuition (Amigud, Arnedo-Moreno, Daradoumis et al, 2017;Clare, Walker & Hobson, 2017). Yet such machine techniques are at an early stage (McHaney, Cronan & Douglas, 2019); more realistic solutions may arise from innovations of assessment where the assignments offered are specifically designed to be resistant to essay mill involvement (Bretag et al, 2019;Joughin, 2010;Patall and Leach, 2015;Sotiriadou, Logan, Daly et al, 2019;Trevelyan & Wilson, 2012;Villarroel, Bloxham, Bruna et al, 2018).…”
Section: Empirical Scholarship On Essay Millsmentioning
confidence: 99%