2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Carbonaceous Deposits in Hydrogenation Catalysis Revisited

Abstract: The effect of carbonaceous deposits on the performance of Pt(111) surfaces as catalysts for the hydrogenation of ethylene was tested by decoupling their preparation, which was done beforehand in an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) environment, from the catalytic runs, which were carried out in an enclosed "high pressure" cell. The time evolution of the gas composition during reaction was followed continuously by mass spectrometry, and the nature of the surface species was determined by in situ reflection−absorption infr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(154 reference statements)
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The kinetic reaction orders implied by this analysis are unreasonably high and indicate that additional factors, besides the reaction rate dependence on [CMA], play a role in determining reaction rates. Two possibilities are considered in the following analysis: (1) the surface of the catalysts, primarily the Cu atoms, are poisoned by organic deposits that form and bind strongly on the surface during the course of the reaction, a common occurrence in hydrogenation catalysis; and/or (2) the products of the reaction, CMO, HCMA, and HCMO, may compete for adsorption sites on the surface, blocking the CMA uptake and consequently inhibiting further catalytic activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetic reaction orders implied by this analysis are unreasonably high and indicate that additional factors, besides the reaction rate dependence on [CMA], play a role in determining reaction rates. Two possibilities are considered in the following analysis: (1) the surface of the catalysts, primarily the Cu atoms, are poisoned by organic deposits that form and bind strongly on the surface during the course of the reaction, a common occurrence in hydrogenation catalysis; and/or (2) the products of the reaction, CMO, HCMA, and HCMO, may compete for adsorption sites on the surface, blocking the CMA uptake and consequently inhibiting further catalytic activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent experiments from our group support the general view of the role of carbonaceous deposits mentioned above but also point to other subtle effects. In particular, by independently controlling the nature of the carbonaceous layer, it was determined that their structure and reactivity do affect the performance of the catalyst . For one, ethylene hydrogenation on Pt(111) was found to be the fastest on a propylidyne-precovered surface and to exhibit rates that are lower by ∼20% with ethylidyne, by ∼35% with butylidyne, and by ∼40% with benzyl moieties (Figure ).…”
Section: Basic Mechanistic Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selectivity is particularly difficult to control in hydrogenation processes with unsaturated organic molecules, because the surface of the catalyst in those cases, typically transition metal nanoparticles dispersed on a high-surface-area support, tends to be covered with strongly bonded carbonaceous deposits. Those carbon-containing layers modify the behavior of the surface and can affect the adsorption mode of the reactants as well as the uptake and activation of hydrogen. , This is particularly critical if the molecule to be hydrogenated contains two or more unsaturations, in which case the initial adsorption mode may define the selectivity of their conversion …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%