1994
DOI: 10.1006/jasc.1994.1039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Bone Density in Structuring Prehistoric Salmon Bone Assemblages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0
7

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
72
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…These measures likely underestimate certain taxa, particularly fish and small mammals, because of taphonomic issues (e.g., sediment pH, leaching, burning, compaction, and microbial action). For example, fish bones are more likely to be underrepresented compared with mammal bones because of differences in bone structure (17)(18)(19)(20). Furthermore, many sites have variable faunal preservation, limiting these more traditional zooarchaeological approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measures likely underestimate certain taxa, particularly fish and small mammals, because of taphonomic issues (e.g., sediment pH, leaching, burning, compaction, and microbial action). For example, fish bones are more likely to be underrepresented compared with mammal bones because of differences in bone structure (17)(18)(19)(20). Furthermore, many sites have variable faunal preservation, limiting these more traditional zooarchaeological approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,32 Alternatively, it may be remedied by supplementing the use of photon densitometry with an independent method of volume determination, such as water displacement. 34,36 In addition to CT, several other visual imaging technologies have shown similar promise in producing bone density measurements. 37 In Box 1, we have sorted published density data sets into four classes (A-D) according to their accuracy as inferred by the method of shape adjustment used in their calculation.…”
Section: Measurements Of Bone Densitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the present study, we seek to quantify only one very broad expression of element frequency: the ratio of cranial to vertebral specimens. This ratio is potentially useful for taphonomic interpretation, since vertebrae of salmonids tend to be denser and therefore more resistant to destruction than their cranial bones (Butler and Chatters, 1994). To quantify crania, we included a list of 29 commonly occurring midline and paired elements; this number was divided by 52, the number in a single skull, to yield a cranial minimum animal unit (MAU).…”
Section: Element Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%