2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.2008361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of Al on Ohmic contact formation on n-type GaN and AlGaN∕GaN

Abstract: A standard metallization scheme for the formation of Ohmic contacts on n-type GaN does exist. It has the following multilayer structure: Ti∕Al∕metal∕Au. Ti is known to extract N out of the GaN. This leaves a high density of N vacancies (donors) near the interface pinning the Fermi level. The created tunnel junction is responsible for an Ohmic contact behavior. Au is deposited as the final metal layer to exclude oxidation of the contact and the metal should limit the diffusion of Au into the layers below and vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
63
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
63
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the exact sensitivity factor for p-and n-AlGaN samples was not known, so the observed ratio of samples from groups A and B at a detection angle of 45°was taken as 1. According to the reported result by Daele et al, 10 we find that the enthalpies of formation of GaN and AlN are about −110.9 and −318.1 kJ/ mol. According to the reported result by Kim et al, 11 we find that the Gibbs formation energy ͑⌬G f ͒ of AlO x is about −1582.3 kJ/ mol, which is lower than that ͑⌬G f = −998.3 kJ/ mol͒ of GaO x .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In this study, the exact sensitivity factor for p-and n-AlGaN samples was not known, so the observed ratio of samples from groups A and B at a detection angle of 45°was taken as 1. According to the reported result by Daele et al, 10 we find that the enthalpies of formation of GaN and AlN are about −110.9 and −318.1 kJ/ mol. According to the reported result by Kim et al, 11 we find that the Gibbs formation energy ͑⌬G f ͒ of AlO x is about −1582.3 kJ/ mol, which is lower than that ͑⌬G f = −998.3 kJ/ mol͒ of GaO x .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This phenomenon of N reduction at interface is consistent with previous report for low Al content case. 24,25 Thus, it is convinced that the desired Al-rich bonding state at the interface has been achieved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Becase the binding energy of the N-Ti [13] and N-Al [22] bonds are too close to distinguish. This can simply be explained by considering the enthalpies of formation of GaN, TiN, and AlN (respectively, -110.9, -265.5, and -318.1 kJ/mol) [6]. However, because the Al-N bond is stronger than the Ti-N bond, resulting in the formation of thin AlN layer at the GaN:O interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%