The Role of Age and Gender in Perceived Vulnerability to Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background: The study of the immune system has been approached using two separate paths, the biological immune system and the behavioral immune system. Recently, Gangestad and Grebe proposed a unique integrated compensatory immune system, where both systems work together and one of them could compensate for the other when necessary. However, few studies have confirmed the existence of this integrated compensatory immune system. Our study represents an attempt to explore the existence of this unique immune system, investigating if the behavioral immune system variables increase when the biological immune system weakens with age. Material and Methods. The cross-sectional design study was made up of a final sample of 1108 participants (45.2% men and 54.2 women) aged 18–64 years. The younger group (18–21 years) was made up of students, whilst the older groups (22 to 64 years) were composed by their relatives and acquaintances, following the snow ball process. The participants completed the Perceived Vulnerability to Disease Questionnaire that assesses perceived infectability and germ aversion. Correlations, analyses of variance (ANOVAs), and independent group comparisons were performed. These analyses showed the relationships between the variables studied, the effects of age and gender in perceived infectability and germ aversion, and the differences that perceived infectability and germ aversion presented in different age-groups separated by gender. Results: A pattern emerged where germ aversion increases as both men and women get older, but perceived infectability decreases up to the age of 50, and then it increases in women from that age onward. Gender differences are only significant in younger participants, with women having higher scores than men in both variables. Conclusion: The results partially support the existence of a unique integrated compensatory biological/behavioral immune system.

Exploring the vulnerability of frontline nurses to COVID-19 and its impact on perceived stress

“…While the females in this study had slightly higher scores in perceived infectability and germ aversion than the males, there were no statistically significant differences. A study 21 on perceived vulnerability to disease provided support to the notion that the women had a higher score than the men. Moreover, previous reports have shown that sex-based differences exist concerning the ability to cope with stress.…”

The impact of gender on emotional reactions, perceived susceptibility and perceived knowledge about COVID-19 among the Israeli public

“…Gender differences are only significant in younger participants, with women scoring higher on perceived vulnerability than men. 16 Women's greater perceived vulnerability to disease may be based on the history of developmental psychology and on current exposure to disease threat. 17 …”

Pharyngeal Detection of Staphylococcus aureus as a Possible Factor Related to Disgust Sensitivity in Humans

“…Other studies showed that pathogen disgust sensitivity is negatively related with hand-grip strength, a simple measure of an individual's general health [12]. Furthermore, disgust sensitivity has been shown to increase with age when the immune system weakens [13].…”