2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of affective teacher-student relationships in adolescents’ school engagement and achievement trajectories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
43
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed that teacher–student relationships regulate both the direct path and first-half path of the intermediary process, which suggests that the teacher–student relationships enhances the predictive effect of parental punishment on the general self-concept and loneliness among adolescents. Results also support previous findings that the teacher–student relationships plays a critical role in protecting healthy growth and development ( Lei et al, 2018 ; Guirong et al, 2019 ; Engels et al, 2021 ). The teacher–student relationships regulated the direct path of parental punishment to predict loneliness; that is, parental punishment positively predicted adolescent loneliness when the teacher–student relationships was high.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Results showed that teacher–student relationships regulate both the direct path and first-half path of the intermediary process, which suggests that the teacher–student relationships enhances the predictive effect of parental punishment on the general self-concept and loneliness among adolescents. Results also support previous findings that the teacher–student relationships plays a critical role in protecting healthy growth and development ( Lei et al, 2018 ; Guirong et al, 2019 ; Engels et al, 2021 ). The teacher–student relationships regulated the direct path of parental punishment to predict loneliness; that is, parental punishment positively predicted adolescent loneliness when the teacher–student relationships was high.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Engagement and disengagement are not fixed states, and student levels of both constructs vary over time (Jang et al, 2016;Burns et al, 2019). In the secondary school years, engagement tends to decrease (Burns et al, 2018;Engels et al, 2021) and disengagement increases (Burns et al, 2019;Engels et al, 2021). Hence, although engagement and disengagement are related constructs, measuring them separately can potentially provide more nuanced information regarding the phenomena, as disengagement captures aspects that engagement cannot (Jang et al, 2016;Bergdahl et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, students could use teachers as a safe base from which to explore the environment and engage in learning activities knowing they have support even in stressful situations (Verschueren and Koomen, 2012). Affective teacher-student relationships have been found to contribute to the engagement and academic outcomes of students (Engels et al, 2021). Relational/rhetorical goal theory explains that each student and teacher brings to the classroom their own expectations and experiences, and to have a successful learning process, instructors must meet the goals of students for being in the class: rhetorical or relational.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por todo ello, Pérez y Filella (2019) plantean que debe integrarse la educación emocional como una innovación psicopedagógica que se enfoque en la formación para la vida que tiene que realizar la escuela, además, se debe apostar por desarrollar procesos de educación emocional que propicien ambientes de aprendizaje cálidos, motivantes y positivos (Agulló et al, 2011;Brackett et al, 2004;Buitrago et al, 2019;Cherniss et al, 2006;Eren et al, 2009;Herrera et al, π 2017;Herrera, Buitrago, Lorenzo, & Badena, 2015;Herrera, Buitrago, Lorenzo, & Perandones, 2015;Gil-Olarte et al, 2006;Greenberg et al, 2003), así como un clima emocional y social de aula positivo (Barrientos et al, 2019;Hubel et al, 2020). Por su parte, Extremera et al (2019), Engels et al (2021), así como Amador y Treglown (2020) enfatizan en la importancia de trabajar en torno a la relación de la IE y el engagement, mientras que Palomera et al (2019) apuestan por la formación en valores y competencias personales del profesorado, las cuales se relacionan con habilidades de autogestión, liderazgo, trabajo colaborativo y en equipo, y comunicación asertiva (Cañas & Hernández, 2019). Sumado a ello, Rendón (2019) plantea que se deben abordar los estilos y maneras de enseñanza del profesorado desde el crisol de las emociones, así como de la construcción del concepto y la experiencia de paz (Gutiérrez-Torres & Buitrago-Velandia, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified