2006
DOI: 10.1080/13670050608668651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Acquisition and Learning In Young Children's Bilingual Development: A Sociocultural Interpretation

Abstract: This paper takes a sociocultural approach to exploring the factors that enhance young children's bilingual development. The language excerpts presented were gathered as part of a three-year Early Childhood Centre of Innovation project funded by the New Zealand government. Data gathered in this project challenge Krashen's (1981) position that young children will generally acquire another language through subconscious osmosis, rather than through the conscious effort of learning. Evidence is put forward that ill… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The home language is also regarded as an important tool for thinking and cognitive development, and interactions among learners provide possible opportunities for furthering learning (Baker, 2006;Vine, 2003). These perspectives fit well with the concept of co-construction and the idea that it is through exploratory talk that teacher and learners actively collaborate to build ideas (Black, 2004); and with recent insights into young children as active bilingual learners (Haworth et al, 2006b). Furthermore, these ideas mesh effectively with the concept of knowledge creation as a social process proposed by Paavola et al (2004) as a third metaphor of learning (in addition to the acquisition and participation metaphors).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The home language is also regarded as an important tool for thinking and cognitive development, and interactions among learners provide possible opportunities for furthering learning (Baker, 2006;Vine, 2003). These perspectives fit well with the concept of co-construction and the idea that it is through exploratory talk that teacher and learners actively collaborate to build ideas (Black, 2004); and with recent insights into young children as active bilingual learners (Haworth et al, 2006b). Furthermore, these ideas mesh effectively with the concept of knowledge creation as a social process proposed by Paavola et al (2004) as a third metaphor of learning (in addition to the acquisition and participation metaphors).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Cycle 1 focused on children's friendships in an intercultural setting and yielded considerable insight into purposeful Samoan language use in informal play settings (Haworth et al, 2006b) and the significance of intercultural interaction and friendships for this process. The focus in Cycle 2 was on how teachers support children's active engagement in complex and sustained learning (Simmons et al, 2005) and yielded five teaching strategies consistent with sociocultural pedagogy.…”
Section: The Action Research Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Haworth et al (2004) pointed out that literature does not clearly determine the importance of teachers in developing young children's bilingualism. This is explained by the dominance of Krashen's (1981) theories, "which hold that fluency in another language is gained through a process of natural acquisition, rather than through conscious learning" (p. 302).…”
Section: The Factors Influencing On Effectiveness Of Bilingual Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, social interactions take place in geographical and interpersonal spaces that are characterized by a set of norms and expectations about communicative behavior, and therefore, the development of language competence is shaped by the types of exposure to language input, opportunities to practice the language, and the norms and expectations that are related to language use (Blommaert et al, 2005). Thus, differences in home and school settings as well as other relevant settings (like peer groups and neighborhoods) provide different kinds of spaces for language use and opportunities for language development among children (Haworth, 2006). Second, since language is embedded in the cultural context, one must examine the pragmatics of language use to understand how language is used and interpreted in a given context.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%