“…Increased awareness and interest have translated into improved education, as both the electives and international missions fulfill the six core competencies of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the Residency Review Committee [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. The multiple benefits to the trainees and the communities served have been previously reported [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ], but controversy still persists [ 17 ]. Specifically, critics of international surgical missions have pointed out the perils that result from visiting surgeons performing complex procedures or procedures they are unqualified to perform, and then leaving the patients with local physicians to manage pursuant complications [ 17 ].…”