1996
DOI: 10.1016/0379-0738(96)01971-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role and duties of the shoeprint/toolmark examiner in forensic laboratories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This architecture consists of three branches-an encoder F θ (·) that takes as input a shoeprint image X, a delta branch G ω (·) that encodes a representation of time from a parameter ∆ t , and a decoder H β (·) that learns an upsampling function to predict the wear pattern. These branches take the form shown in (1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This architecture consists of three branches-an encoder F θ (·) that takes as input a shoeprint image X, a delta branch G ω (·) that encodes a representation of time from a parameter ∆ t , and a decoder H β (·) that learns an upsampling function to predict the wear pattern. These branches take the form shown in (1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the many forms of physical evidence found at crime scenes, shoeprints are one of the most frequently seen, with a high degree of evidential value attributed to them. Marks and prints formed by the footwear worn by the criminal(s) are frequently found at scenes-of-crime and their study was being recorded as early as 1786 [1]. This is in part due to the ability of a shoeprint to uniquely identify an individual, by evaluation of the combination of tears, nicks, cuts, scratches and other abrasions that form on the outsole as a function of wear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%