Ask the Experts 2020
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197510445.003.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rockefeller Foundation, the University New Music Center, and “Foundation Music”

Abstract: This chapter focuses on the Rockefeller Foundation’s support of university new music centers and contemporary chamber ensembles, offering new insights into a commonly understood historiography of U.S. twentieth-century music: the dominance and prestige of experimental music and serialism at universities. Most notably, composers at Columbia, Princeton, the University of Chicago, and Mills College served dually as outside experts and commissioned artists and performers. Milton Babbitt, Otto Luening, and Vladimir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19. Michael Sy Uy's (2020) salient and allied research also charters new territory with regard to music policies and norms at the time that I completed my manuscript revision. Whereas Binkiewicz focused her study on the realm of visual art, Uy's work weighs the role played by public and private funding bodies in institutionalizing western classical music artists and models of production.…”
Section: Endowment and Collective Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19. Michael Sy Uy's (2020) salient and allied research also charters new territory with regard to music policies and norms at the time that I completed my manuscript revision. Whereas Binkiewicz focused her study on the realm of visual art, Uy's work weighs the role played by public and private funding bodies in institutionalizing western classical music artists and models of production.…”
Section: Endowment and Collective Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Funding Bodies deftly tackles fifty years of the agency's activities in three fifteen-year sections from 1965 to 2016, filling a scholarly gap in dance history and arts policy research, as the first monograph about the NEA Dance Program. The publication adds to a series of recent, discipline-specific investigations into the NEA, including Michael Sy Uy's Ask the Experts: How Ford, Rockefeller, and the NEA Changed American Music (2020), and Donna M. Binkiewicz's, Federalizing the Muse: United States Arts Policy and the National Endowment for the Arts, 1965-1980 (2004). Wilbur supports her readers through the administrative history of the NEA by deploying the three “hegemonic ‘verbs’ of dance authorization:” leveraging, touring, and incorporating (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%