2008
DOI: 10.1179/hma.2008.1.1.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rock Art Stability Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Managing rock art sites requires an initial non-invasive and cost-effective scientific study of the integrity of the rock (Dorn et al, 2008;Allen and Groom, 2013;Giesen et al, 2014). Combining this information with information on the particular characteristics of the site (climate, topography, type of rock, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Managing rock art sites requires an initial non-invasive and cost-effective scientific study of the integrity of the rock (Dorn et al, 2008;Allen and Groom, 2013;Giesen et al, 2014). Combining this information with information on the particular characteristics of the site (climate, topography, type of rock, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial study should take into account deterioration due to different weathering and anthropogenic processes. A valuable initiative in this regard is the rock art stability index (RASI) (Dorn et al, 2008;Cerveny et al, 2016;Whitley, 2016), based on an extensive database of alteration forms affecting rock art carved in different rocks in different climates around the world. This information is not only a useful starting point for risk assessment related to natural or anthropogenic processes, it can also easily be used by personnel with minimal training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, rock art (paintings and engravings) may suffer strong weathering and taphonomic processes -including physical, chemical and biological weatheringand in some cases can be completely erased. For these reasons, the understanding of the processes leading to rock art preservation and/or destruction and its paleoenvironmental context are as important as its cultural, archaeological, and artistic implications (Whitley, 2005;Dorn, 2006;Dorn et al, 2008;Bednarik, 2012;Giesen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural heritage management involves the blending of science, history, art, architecture, and policy with historically important and environmentally sensitive heritage sites, especially those in arid environments, remaining susceptible to human interaction and induced deterioration in addition to natural stresses [1][2][3]. Rock art represents one such tangible piece of cultural stone heritage, and understanding both rock art and its (potential) decay remains important for its management, conservation, and/or protection [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Non-invasive techniques in rock art assessment, such as the Rock Art Stability Index [RASI, see 7], provide a baseline study from which these important pieces of cultural heritage may be identified and analyzed for trends in polygenetic deterioration processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%