1989
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1989.10478874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Robust Inference for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
814
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,977 publications
(828 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
814
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the proportional hazards assumption was violated, we adjusted the covariance matrix using Lin and Wei's robust sandwich estimates. 9 We adjusted Cox proportional hazards models for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and the baseline measure of the independent variable. When models were not stratified by treatment arm, we included treatment arm as a covariate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the proportional hazards assumption was violated, we adjusted the covariance matrix using Lin and Wei's robust sandwich estimates. 9 We adjusted Cox proportional hazards models for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and the baseline measure of the independent variable. When models were not stratified by treatment arm, we included treatment arm as a covariate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the Efron (Efron 1977) method to handle tied cases with a robust standard error estimator (Lin and Wei 1989).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data given here are based on the stepwise method. The qualitative result was not dependent on the method chosen (stepwise method, forward selection, and backward elimination methods were used) [4,8]. 2-sided statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regression analysis of survival data was performed based on the Cox proportional hazards model and using the conditional logit regression with the SAS PHREG procedure. Stepwise forward selection and backward elimination methods were used [4,5]. 2-sided statistical significance was set at 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%