2005
DOI: 10.2308/0148-4184.32.1.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Roaring Nineties: Accounting History Comes of Age

Abstract: The paper outlines developments in the accounting history literature during the 1990s. The introduction chronicles the immense broadening of publication opportunities in accounting history that characterized the decade. To a certain extent, this enhancement of outlets resulted from a richer dialogue among accounting historians who became increasingly willing to debate paradigmatic and methodological issues. In this context, the paper identifies and discusses “traditional” and “critical” forms of accounting his… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 236 publications
1
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Napier's (2006) There are other signs of recent gender blindness, partial vision or gaze aversion in accounting history. Taxonomic reviews of research trends and future directions during and since the so-called 'Roaring Nineties' locate gender as a rather tangential element of critical accounting history as opposed to a field worthy of separate classification (Carnegie and Napier, 1996;Fleischman and Radcliffe, 2005). Neither feminist, gender or women's history were identified as arenas of accounting history debate during what is perceived as a golden decade for accounting history research.…”
Section: A Review Of Progress Since 1992mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Napier's (2006) There are other signs of recent gender blindness, partial vision or gaze aversion in accounting history. Taxonomic reviews of research trends and future directions during and since the so-called 'Roaring Nineties' locate gender as a rather tangential element of critical accounting history as opposed to a field worthy of separate classification (Carnegie and Napier, 1996;Fleischman and Radcliffe, 2005). Neither feminist, gender or women's history were identified as arenas of accounting history debate during what is perceived as a golden decade for accounting history research.…”
Section: A Review Of Progress Since 1992mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover I have also considered some relevant papers and articles such as the ones by Garry D. Carnegie and B. N. Potter (2000), Garry D. Carnegie and C. J. Napier (2002), Salvador Carmona (2003), Richard K. Fleischman and Vaughan S. Radcliffe (2005) as well as the subsequent discussion carried on it by Garry D. Carnegie (2006) and Vaughan S. Radcliffe (2006), and finally the paper by Stephen P. Walker (2005).…”
Section: Introduction: Scope Methodology Sources and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their recent survey of the development of accounting history in the 1990s, Fleischman and Radcliffe (2005) have noted that the mainstream approach of the neoclassical/economic-rationalist school came increasingly under attack from critical theorists, most notably those adopting a Marxist or Foucauldian perspective. Clearly, any historical event, or series of events, can be interpreted through a number of different lenses: the Marxist lens which sees developments in terms of the exploitation of labour by capital to extract labour's surplus value; the Foucauldian lens of power-knowledge relations; as well as from the neoclassical perspective which sees developments as a rational business response to opportunities and problems created by technological developments and changing market environments.…”
Section: Interpreting Accounting and Cost Developments At Ginorimentioning
confidence: 98%