2016
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Road to Reproducibility in Animal Research

Abstract: Reproducibility of research findings is the hallmark of scientific advance. However, the recently noted lack of reproducibility and transparency of published research using animal models of human biology and disease has alarmed funders, scientists and the public. Improved reporting of methodology and better use of statistical tools are needed to enhance the quality and utility of published research. Reporting guidelines like ARRIVE have been devised to achieve these goals, but most biomedical research journals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, some landmark journals made additional efforts to counter this trend. In an attempt to increase the adherence to ethical use of animals and reporting, some journals have proposed a simplified, and easier to fill, version of the ARRIVE guidelines [ 73 , 74 ], others have developed their own compulsory and comprehensive animal ethics checklist [ 75 ], or organized discussion forums to address these issues [ 76 ]. It is worth noting that reviewers are usually chosen for their expertise in the scientific field of the study, and may lack the information, knowledge (or motivation) to assess whether a study is ethically sound beyond usual superficial statements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some landmark journals made additional efforts to counter this trend. In an attempt to increase the adherence to ethical use of animals and reporting, some journals have proposed a simplified, and easier to fill, version of the ARRIVE guidelines [ 73 , 74 ], others have developed their own compulsory and comprehensive animal ethics checklist [ 75 ], or organized discussion forums to address these issues [ 76 ]. It is worth noting that reviewers are usually chosen for their expertise in the scientific field of the study, and may lack the information, knowledge (or motivation) to assess whether a study is ethically sound beyond usual superficial statements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anhedonia, which is the loss of sensitivity to reward and related to depression, was determined by the sucrose preference test (Romano et al, 2015). In light of recently published concerns about reproducibility of animal research (Pusztai et al, 2013; Jilka, 2016) we adopted Noldus video-tracking for all the behavioral assays reported herein. This methodology avoids experimenter bias and increases accuracy of the collected data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of rigor and reproducibility in research has been well documented and is the subject of initiatives at the National Institutes of Health . This problem is probably most important in preclinical studies, including studies of animal disease models, highlighting the value of harmonization of reagents and assay protocols, quality control systems, and consensus best practices for experimental design, data analysis, and reporting . The registration of clinical trials via ClinicalTrials.gov and their subsequent publication may contribute to reducing publication bias for clinical studies.…”
Section: How To Approach Mbmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 This problem is probably most important in preclinical studies, including studies of animal disease models, highlighting the value of harmonization of reagents and assay protocols, quality control systems, and consensus best practices for experimental design, data analysis, and reporting. [12][13][14][15] The registration of clinical trials via ClinicalTrials.…”
Section: Illustrative Applications: Reference 21mentioning
confidence: 99%