1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-0101(96)00225-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The RNA-N-glycosidase activity of Shiga-like toxin I: Kinetic parameters of the native and activated toxin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, after trypsin and TCEP treatment to release the A1 subunits, Stx1A1 and Stx2A1 were able to depurinate the yeast ribosome at 374-fold and 92-fold higher levels than Stx1 and Stx2 holotoxins, respectively, at 0.5 µM ribosome concentration (Figure 6a). A previous study examined the k cat and K m of Stx1 holotoxin on Artemia salina ribosomes before and after treatment with trypsin, urea and DTT [33]. Our results are consistent with this study in the requirement for activation, although this study used a different assay, different source of ribosomes, different method of activation, and much higher toxin concentrations [33].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, after trypsin and TCEP treatment to release the A1 subunits, Stx1A1 and Stx2A1 were able to depurinate the yeast ribosome at 374-fold and 92-fold higher levels than Stx1 and Stx2 holotoxins, respectively, at 0.5 µM ribosome concentration (Figure 6a). A previous study examined the k cat and K m of Stx1 holotoxin on Artemia salina ribosomes before and after treatment with trypsin, urea and DTT [33]. Our results are consistent with this study in the requirement for activation, although this study used a different assay, different source of ribosomes, different method of activation, and much higher toxin concentrations [33].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A previous study examined the k cat and K m of Stx1 holotoxin on Artemia salina ribosomes before and after treatment with trypsin, urea and DTT [33]. Our results are consistent with this study in the requirement for activation, although this study used a different assay, different source of ribosomes, different method of activation, and much higher toxin concentrations [33]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In previous studies, differences were not observed for the protein synthesis inhibition abilities of Stx1 and Stx2 by using cell-free translation assays (23,24,52). While in some of these studies, the holotoxin was used (24), in others, the holotoxin was activated by digestion with trypsin to release the A1 chain from the A2-B5 complex or by chemical treatment with urea or DTT to break the disulfide bond between the A1 and A2 chains (23,24,53,54).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Both A chain fragments remain linked by a single disulfide bond which is thought to be reduced in the ER lumen [8], [9], [10]. The A 1 domain is then retrotranslocated to the cytosol by virtue of its newly exposed hydrophobic C-terminus, where it eventually docks onto ribosomes and subsequently depurinates a single adenine base (A 4324 ) in the sarcin-ricin loop (SRL) of 28S rRNA [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. This depurination event creates an apurinic site that prevents elongation factor 1 (EF-1)-dependent amino-acyl tRNA from binding to the ribosome and EF-2-catalysed translocation during elongation, leading to an inhibition of protein synthesis [16], [17], [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%