2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The risky business of planning reform – The evolution of local spatial planning in Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second warning is that any critiques of planning and all the recommendations for alternative forms of planning might be used for the better or worse. Several attempts to improve planning have, in fact, opened the way for planning reforms that not only made planning more difficult, but certainly did not always improve spatial governance in terms of democracy, public goods, and environmental sustainability (Lennon, Waldron 2019;Lord, Tewdwr-Jones 2018;Niedziałkowski, Beunen 2019). The preferred relation between planning and government cannot be judged in general terms nor distilled from theory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second warning is that any critiques of planning and all the recommendations for alternative forms of planning might be used for the better or worse. Several attempts to improve planning have, in fact, opened the way for planning reforms that not only made planning more difficult, but certainly did not always improve spatial governance in terms of democracy, public goods, and environmental sustainability (Lennon, Waldron 2019;Lord, Tewdwr-Jones 2018;Niedziałkowski, Beunen 2019). The preferred relation between planning and government cannot be judged in general terms nor distilled from theory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neo-liberal and market-oriented ideas had a profound 118 disP 225 • 57.2 (2/2021) impact on planning and the way in which it is institutionalised. In several countries, the critiques of planning have served the minimalisation and marginalisation of planning as a government domain (Gunder 2010;Lennon, Waldron 2019;Lord, Tewdwr-Jones 2014;Niedziałkowski, Beunen 2019;Olesen, Carter 2018). Planning reform consequently implied that planning was deregulated and decentralised.…”
Section: Rethinking Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to several legal and administrative conditions, urban green space in Warsaw is jeopardized by land development that significantly grew after the 1989 transition and then after EU accession in 2004, which were followed by inflow of funds for new public and private investments and deregulation of land use planning (Niedziałkowski and Beunen, 2019). Past neglect in green space management and observed effects of climate change also negatively influenced urban green space and contributed to the need for increased tree removal (Environmental Protection Program for the Capital City of Warsaw for the years 2017-2020 with a perspective until 2023, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land-use structure is affected by geographic location; policies implemented at the local, regional, and national level; socioeconomic situation; spatial features that determine potential development strategies in a given area; existing land-use types; a need to address and resolve the consequences of misguided planning decisions; provision of local zoning plans and zoning decisions; restructuring measures implemented in a given area; as well as guidelines for rational land management [7][8][9]. Despite the adoption of numerous legal acts aimed at protection of the environment and promotion of sustainable development, poorly designed legislation can exert a negative impact on land-use structure [10]. Sustainable land use is influenced by socioeconomic processes that affect spatial development, and by the effectiveness of land planning and land management tools that regulate these processes [11].…”
Section: Sustainable Land Use and Land-use Structurementioning
confidence: 99%