The Risks of the Mask

Abstract

In this article we go beyond epidemiological models to make a case for a more holistic approach to the use of face masks as a risk mitigation factor in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. We argue that while masking offers a measure of protection from infection, its moral, political, and affective implications produce two main collateral risks. These are: (1) the heightening of social boundaries, which thus increase the potential of conflict between different social groups; and (2) the impairment of normative interaction rituals followed by a dynamic of distancing, insulation, and social alienation. While we stop short from constructing a hierarchy of risks, we do argue that policy makers should consider these collateral risks as part of any large-scale Covid-19 risk mitigation and communication strategy. We thus provide some principled guidance on how that might be done.

Satisfaction With Governmental Risk Communication Both Increases and Decreases COVID-19 Mitigation Behaviours

“…Societal risk perceptions, however, also associate positively with risk mitigation behaviours, suggesting that efforts to highlight those risks could be further beneficial for government entities seeking to promote risk mitigation actions. This is consistent with recent research revealing that social histories and myths concerning masking in societies have heavily influenced the political nature of relevant mitigation actions (68). Discourse about risk mitigation behaviours shapes risk perceptions, and then adoption of those behaviours.…”

Factors associated with anxiety symptoms among medical laboratory professionals in Khobar: Single institution study

“…Nevertheless, Saudi Arabia made a remarkable effort to contain the pandemic by providing the hospital with well-equipped materials and, more importantly, a quick risk management plan to cope with the pandemic, which had a major effect on reducing the stress among HCP and the general population (45, 46). Although the use of masks helped reduce the spread of the disease, some guidelines were recommended to follow during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic (47). Another limitation of the study was that patient were not asked about previous history of anxiety, this could be correlated with anxiety level in the baseline level before COVID-19.…”