2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00592-018-1208-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The risk stratification of adverse neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes (STRONG) study

Abstract: A deep investigation on the factors associated with adverse neonatal outcomes requires a risk stratification. In particular, great attention must be paid to the prevention and treatment of obesity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urinary tract infection (n = 3; 3.4%), hypoglycemia (n = 2; 2.27%), polyhydramnios (n = 2; 2.27%), vaginitis (n = 4; 4.54%), pre-eclampsia (n = 4; 4.54%) and chronic fetal distress with IUGR (n = 2; 2.27%) were the secondary outcomes identified during prenatal followups. These findings are compatible with data available in the medical literature [28][29][30][31][32]34,35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Urinary tract infection (n = 3; 3.4%), hypoglycemia (n = 2; 2.27%), polyhydramnios (n = 2; 2.27%), vaginitis (n = 4; 4.54%), pre-eclampsia (n = 4; 4.54%) and chronic fetal distress with IUGR (n = 2; 2.27%) were the secondary outcomes identified during prenatal followups. These findings are compatible with data available in the medical literature [28][29][30][31][32]34,35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Diabetic pregnant women presented the following primary outcomes: fetal and neonatal mortality (1.8%), macrosomia (6.81%), prematurity (16.6%) and hospitalization in neonatal ICU (9 %). All these findings presented lower rates than the ones reported in many other services [32][33][34][35]. There was an association between diabetes and prematurity and between diabetes and hospitalization in neonatal ICU (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The 2018 Italian STRONG study examined a cohort of comparatively older (median age: 36.8 vs. 31.0 years) and thinner (median pre‐gestational BMI: 24.8 vs. 26.5 kg/m 2 ) women and reported a similar rate of neonatal hypoglycaemia (7.2% vs. 7.8%) and a higher rate of hyperbilirubinemia (10.4% vs. 7.5%). STRONG identified maternal overweightness (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.02–2.27) and obesity (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.04–2.51) to be associated neonatal hypoglycaemia and did not identify any significant predictors of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, identification of women with characteristics such as chronic hypertension, low socio-economic status and multiparity should alert caregivers to the possibility of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes. It has been reported that pre-pregnancy obesity predicted adverse outcomes in GDM women [20]; however, due to missing data regarding pre-pregnancy obesity, we could not include obesity as a predictor in our model. No studies have looked at women with actual undiagnosed type 2 diabetes; however, one previous study compared outcomes in women with presumed undiagnosed type 2 diabetes, identified by a fasting glucose of ≥7.0 mmol/l or a 2-hour glucose of ≥11.1 mmol/l during pregnancy, with women who had early-onset GDM but were without these characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%