The Risk–Return Binomial After Rating Changes

Abstract

Risk-averse investors take into consideration risk-return tradeoff for decide their new position after the release of relevant information. This paper analyzes the informational content of rating change announcements focusing on the joint reaction they cause on the risk-return binomial. Our purpose is to identify the main factors that signal which announcements are informative. To do that we estimate a binomial logit model for the probability of informative content of credit rating announcements.We analyze a sample of rating events affecting Spanish listed firms from 2000 to 2010.Empirical results show significant differences in the informative content between positive and negative rating events. For both kinds of announcements, we find higher informative content when agencies agree about the new level of solvency, whereas those affecting high covered firm that operate in highly regulated sectors are the less informative. Other factors as the presence of a previous rating refinements or trends in the credit quality reveals different information depending on the direction of the rating event. Finally, we find the announcements after de crisis disclose less information, suggesting a loss of reputation of CRAs. Abstract.Risk-averse investors take into consideration risk-return tradeoff for decide their new position after the release of relevant information. This paper analyzes the informational content of rating change announcements focusing on the joint reaction they cause on the risk-return binomial. Our purpose is to identify the main factors that signal which announcements are informative. To do that we estimate a binomial logit model for the probability of informative content of credit rating announcements.We analyze a sample of rating events affecting Spanish listed firms from 2000 to 2010.Empirical results show significant differences in the informative content between positive and negative rating events. For both kinds of announcements, we find higher informative content when agencies agree about the new level of solvency, whereas those affecting high covered firm that operate in highly regulated sectors are the less informative. Other factors as the presence of a previous rating refinements or trends in the credit quality reveals different information depending on the direction of the rating event. Finally, we find the announcements after de crisis disclose less information, suggesting a loss of reputation of CRAs. JEL Classification: G12, G14, G24, C22Key words: Abnormal return, abnormal systematic risk, abnormal volatility, logit model Acknowledgements:

Do credit ratings affect spread and return? A study of structured finance products

“…Weinstein (1977), however, concludes that bond returns are not related to rating changes in a period of up to 6 months after the announcements. Later, other authors have identified links between rating announcements and issuance spread (e.g., Iannotta, Nocera, & Resti, 2013) and return (e.g., Abad & Robles, 2015;Liu & Thakor, 1984;Stover, 1991).…”

The regulatory and policy variables influencing FDI in South Africa

“…Looking at the South African investment status, this is a low number, although the issue could be because of high unemployment figures. Most of the elderly people above 60 years old live primarily on social grants (Abad & Robles, 2015). However, Karimli et al (2014, p. 661) mentioned that policy makers have recently been calling for the acceleration of savings accounts as a tool to empower those who are poverty stricken.…”