1996
DOI: 10.1159/000473789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Risk of Malignancy in the Surgical Margin at Radical Prostatectomy Reduced Almost Three-Fold in Patients Given Neo-Adjuvant Hormone Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive margin rate was 5.8%, lower than that reported after 3 months of NHT in similar cohorts of patients 34,36,37 (Figure 3). No cancer was identi®ed in the radical prostatectomy specimen in 13% of cases.…”
Section: Clinical Studies With Long-term Neoadjuvant Therapycontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The positive margin rate was 5.8%, lower than that reported after 3 months of NHT in similar cohorts of patients 34,36,37 (Figure 3). No cancer was identi®ed in the radical prostatectomy specimen in 13% of cases.…”
Section: Clinical Studies With Long-term Neoadjuvant Therapycontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…For irradiated patients, NHT was administered throughout the course of radiotherapy. NHT was also given to 51% of the patients in the RP group who were participating in a clinical study (11).…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy (Nht)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five of the 12 trials presented pathological results obtained immediately postoperatively. 14,[18][19][20][21] Longer term follow-up was not available from these studies. The remaining studies followed patients from 5 months to 5 years post-operatively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All four studies that compared rates of positive surgical margins (unfavourable outcome) between NHT + RP and RP-only groups [18][19][20] found statistically significant differences postoperatively in favour of the NHT patients: 23 versus 41% ( p = 0.013), 13 versus 38.5% ( p = 0.0006), 19 versus 46% ( p = 0.01) and 7.8 versus 33.8% ( p < 0.0001). Gleave and co-workers compared 3 months and 8 months preoperative therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%