The risk of losing national identity in the twenty-first century Romania, or national identity from adaptation to self-censorship

Abstract

In the contemporary world of extremely dynamic movements in the fields of territorial state reconfiguration, economic “colonization”, globalization, Europeanization, migration of population, borrowing of cultural values and intensified cultural exchange or transfer, defining national identity has become a process which registers numerous changes and encounters various challenges. The classical features that assisted this process of defining national identity in the past – a historic territory, common myths, historical memories and values, a common public culture, common legal rights and duties, a common economy with territorial mobility (A. D. Smith 1991: 14) – undergo significant transformations each decade and the definition of a nation’s identity calls for important reconsiderations. One aspect worth considering is that of losing or self-censoring one’s national identity due to a nation’s own intention or some external demands of adaptation to general aspects of political, economic, financial, social, or cultural nature. Our paper intends to explore some of the causes or factors that might lead to twenty-first century Romania’s weakening, degradation or loss of national identity and suggest some possible solutions against such a process.

The Process of Ethnocentralizing the Concept of Ecological Agroalimentary Products for the Romanian Urban Consumer

“…Maize-Maize flour is largely used as a prime ingredient in "mămăligă" (a sort of maize porridge similar to Italian polenta). "Mămăliga", quite legitimately, has often been associated with the history of Romanians [25]. Gastronomically speaking, "mămăliga" successfully replaces bread in association with foods based on cheese, eggs, or meat (and often combined).…”

The Palace Architecture of the Roma Population in Romania

“…The structure of households, including those for Roma dwellings, was tightly connected to the socio-economic statute which the population experienced during different epochs (Suciu and Culea 2015). The changes in Roma architecture elements are generated mainly by the rich (Vincze et al 2013).…”