2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The risk of bleeding and all-cause mortality with edoxaban versus vitamin K antagonists: A meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, patients receiving VKAs must be closely monitored. Meta-analyses of clinical trials in patients with VTE-associated conditions other than CTEPH have shown that NOACs are as effective as VKAs in preventing VTE and cardiovascular events, with similar rates of hemorrhages [79][80][81]. Data on the efficacy and safety of VKAs and NOACs in CTEPH are, however, limited.…”
Section: Anticoagulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, patients receiving VKAs must be closely monitored. Meta-analyses of clinical trials in patients with VTE-associated conditions other than CTEPH have shown that NOACs are as effective as VKAs in preventing VTE and cardiovascular events, with similar rates of hemorrhages [79][80][81]. Data on the efficacy and safety of VKAs and NOACs in CTEPH are, however, limited.…”
Section: Anticoagulationmentioning
confidence: 99%