2022
DOI: 10.5001/omj.2022.71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Risk of Antipsychotic Drugs on Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract: Objectives To investigate the association between the consumption of antipsychotic drugs and breast cancer. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, relevant studies were extracted from different databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, Medline, and additional sources. The selected studies were statistically analyzed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eleven (34%) of the included articles were meta-analyses of observational studies, ( Correll et al, 2022 , Indrakusuma et al, 2022 , Liu et al, 2021 , Mortensen et al, 2020 , Nosè et al, 2015 , Papola et al, 2018 , Seppala et al, 2018 , Vancampfort et al, 2015 , Wang et al, 2021 , Yang et al, 2018 , Zivkovic et al, 2019 ) reporting data on 15 adverse effects and 262 studies, with sample sizes ranging from 11,789 to over 28,000,000 (total N = 38,350,349), which compared exposed to non-exposed individuals. Primary studies were mostly case-control and cohort designs, with some self-controlled case series, cross-over or cross-sectional designs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven (34%) of the included articles were meta-analyses of observational studies, ( Correll et al, 2022 , Indrakusuma et al, 2022 , Liu et al, 2021 , Mortensen et al, 2020 , Nosè et al, 2015 , Papola et al, 2018 , Seppala et al, 2018 , Vancampfort et al, 2015 , Wang et al, 2021 , Yang et al, 2018 , Zivkovic et al, 2019 ) reporting data on 15 adverse effects and 262 studies, with sample sizes ranging from 11,789 to over 28,000,000 (total N = 38,350,349), which compared exposed to non-exposed individuals. Primary studies were mostly case-control and cohort designs, with some self-controlled case series, cross-over or cross-sectional designs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%