2003
DOI: 10.1080/13556207.2003.10785342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Risk Map of Italian Cultural Heritage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods outlined in this study have offered one means of considering preservation and risk, but equally highlight the issues associated with basing an analysis solely on a literature review or generalised and proxy data. A handful of countries have developed risk maps as a more rational and economical means of undertaking the management of archaeological monuments, but these almost exclusively deal with upstanding or architectural remains, and the analysis of risk typically concentrates on catastrophic events such as earthquakes and flooding [4][5][6], or the long-term effects of pollution, tourism, erosion and climate change [5,7,8]. By contrast, risk maps concerning buried heritage, or the post-depositional events experienced at the soil interface, are noticeably lacking.…”
Section: Implications For Future Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methods outlined in this study have offered one means of considering preservation and risk, but equally highlight the issues associated with basing an analysis solely on a literature review or generalised and proxy data. A handful of countries have developed risk maps as a more rational and economical means of undertaking the management of archaeological monuments, but these almost exclusively deal with upstanding or architectural remains, and the analysis of risk typically concentrates on catastrophic events such as earthquakes and flooding [4][5][6], or the long-term effects of pollution, tourism, erosion and climate change [5,7,8]. By contrast, risk maps concerning buried heritage, or the post-depositional events experienced at the soil interface, are noticeably lacking.…”
Section: Implications For Future Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, a handful of studies have applied national soil survey data to the archaeological record, but their focus has primarily been on site prospection [1][2][3] and similar efforts have not been extended to an assessment of heritage at risk. Risk maps offer a valuable resource for heritage management; however, recent iterations have concentrated on catastrophic threats, such as natural disasters [4][5][6], or the long-term effects of pollution, tourism, erosion or climate change [5,7,8]. By comparison, very few efforts have mapped the risk associated with buried heritage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step in this process will be the formalisation of this project and further investigation into similar undertakings globally. The work undertaken in Italy under the Istituto Centrale per il Restauro (ICR) provides a potential model which can be used to guide this process (UNSECO, 2010;Accardo et al 2003).…”
Section: Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protection and preservation of cultural heritage sites from these threats, by incorporating sustainable development and resilience initiatives, constitutes a significant concern worldwide over the last decades. The link between threats and built cultural heritage at risk has been implemented in numerous projects on national and European levels, often resulting in comprehensive risk mapping and threat monitoring (Accardo, Giani, & Giovagnoli, 2003;Della Torre, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%