2023
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The risk factors of postoperative hypoxemia in patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection

Xu’an Wang,
Jun Ma,
Duomao Lin
et al.

Abstract: Hypoxemia is one of the most common complications in patients after Stanford type A acute aortic dissection surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of circulating ANG II level with postoperative hypoxemia and to identify the risk factors for postoperative hypoxemia in Stanford type A acute aortic dissection patients. In this study, 88 patients who underwent Stanford type A acute aortic dissection surgery were enrolled. Postoperative hypoxemia is defined by the oxygenation index (OI). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, employing wound care protocols designed for patients with diminished tissue repair mechanisms, as well as personalized postoperative nutritional plans to promote recovery. This underlines the efficacy of the surgical approach and postoperative management, suggesting that while obesity presents certain complexities, they can be adeptly managed with the right surgical strategy and postoperative care ( 21 , 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For example, employing wound care protocols designed for patients with diminished tissue repair mechanisms, as well as personalized postoperative nutritional plans to promote recovery. This underlines the efficacy of the surgical approach and postoperative management, suggesting that while obesity presents certain complexities, they can be adeptly managed with the right surgical strategy and postoperative care ( 21 , 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%