The risk factors and maternal adverse outcomes of stillbirth

Şimşek, Deniz; Demirci, Ahmet; Çakmak, Burcu Dinçgez

doi:10.28982/josam.844903

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

(33 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This increase was statistically significant compared to the normal IDI patients. A recent study declared that the stillbirth rate was 11.2 per 1.000 births in the same hospital ( 27 ) . The delivery interval might not be the only explanation for the increased rate of stillbirth.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Short interdelivery interval in modern obstetrics: Maternal and neonatal outcomes

İmamoğlu¹,

Şimşek²,

Çakmak³

et al. 2022

tjod

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To investigate the maternal, neonatal outcomes of the patients with short interdelivery interval (IDI) considering initial pregnancy outcomes. Materials and Methods: Women with two consecutive deliveries between 2016 and 2020 were included in the study. The maternal and neonatal outcomes of both pregnancies were reviewed. The time interval between consecutive deliveries was calculated. The patients were divided into two groups in terms of IDI either less or more than 24 months. Results: The number of patients with short IDI (≤24 months), and normal IDI was 1.915 and 1.370, respectively. About 15% of the women in both groups had at least one obstetric morbidity. The rates of uterine rupture, placenta previa, and peripartum hysterectomy were higher in women with short IDI. The number of patients with low birth weight, very low birth weight, and stillbirth was higher in the short IDI group. Conclusion: Patients with short interpregnancy intervals should be considered high-risk pregnancy. Adequate contraceptive methods should be used to prevent unintended pregnancies.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%