2013
DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2013.23398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rising Prevalence of Asthma: True Increase, Diagnostic Exchange or Diagnostic Accuracy?

Abstract: In the midst of frequent reports about "the asthma epidemic," results from a number of studies by the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy have shown stable or decreasing prevalence of an overall indicator of respiratory diseases which includes asthma. To resolve these apparently contrary findings, we conducted a time trend analysis using administrative data. Results revealed significant potential for diagnostic exchange: asthma prevalence increased, but that of bronchitis decreased. RésuméDans le contexte des fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary outcome for our study, time-to-airway disease, was defined by total respiratory morbidity (TRM), which is an indicator variable developed by the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy for use with health administrative data in order to overcome coding variability between providers, patients of differing ages, and over time [22]. First published in 1993 [23], TRM has been used in various publications, spanning almost three decades, as a measure of airway disease incidence and prevalence in administrative data [22]. TRM was measured by the following diagnostic codes (ICD-9-CM: 466, 490À493, and 496; ICD-10-CA: J20-J21, J40-J45): asthma, bronchitis, bronchiolitis, emphysema, and chronic airway obstruction [22].…”
Section: Outcome: Airway Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The primary outcome for our study, time-to-airway disease, was defined by total respiratory morbidity (TRM), which is an indicator variable developed by the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy for use with health administrative data in order to overcome coding variability between providers, patients of differing ages, and over time [22]. First published in 1993 [23], TRM has been used in various publications, spanning almost three decades, as a measure of airway disease incidence and prevalence in administrative data [22]. TRM was measured by the following diagnostic codes (ICD-9-CM: 466, 490À493, and 496; ICD-10-CA: J20-J21, J40-J45): asthma, bronchitis, bronchiolitis, emphysema, and chronic airway obstruction [22].…”
Section: Outcome: Airway Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First published in 1993 [23], TRM has been used in various publications, spanning almost three decades, as a measure of airway disease incidence and prevalence in administrative data [22]. TRM was measured by the following diagnostic codes (ICD-9-CM: 466, 490À493, and 496; ICD-10-CA: J20-J21, J40-J45): asthma, bronchitis, bronchiolitis, emphysema, and chronic airway obstruction [22]. In our cohort, airway disease was ascertained from BC's hospital discharge abstracts, outpatient physician claims, and vital statistics death certificates.…”
Section: Outcome: Airway Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most robust approach to test this research hypothesis is a quasiexperimental interrupted time series analysis with a comparison condition. The proposed interrupted time series analysis is strengthened by the use of a social and health data repository that provides an opportunity to link census, social and health data for the entire population of the City of Winnipeg beginning in 1995 22–27. Interrupted time series designs are considered the most valid quasiexperimental designs when a randomised controlled trial is not possible 28 29.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple situations have been shown to influence the utilization of specific diagnostic codes, including a change in codes or the coding system, 5,6 the introduction of new diagnostic criteria, 7,8 increased awareness by physicians and the public for a specific disease, 9 and the substitution of codes for one disease with codes for another (diagnostic shift). [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In the Canadian Province of British Columbia (BC), we identified a unique opportunity to examine the susceptibility of diagnostic coding behavior to a change in drug reimbursement policy. In October 2007, the provincial drug plan began covering the cholinesterase inhibitor medications (ChEIs: donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine) for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) as part of the Alzheimer's Drug Therapy Initiative (ADTI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inaccuracies in diagnostic coding have been discussed as an important source of bias; however, such inaccuracies were generally assumed to be constant over the study period, in spite of evidence that this might not be the case. Multiple situations have been shown to influence the utilization of specific diagnostic codes, including a change in codes or the coding system, the introduction of new diagnostic criteria, increased awareness by physicians and the public for a specific disease, and the substitution of codes for one disease with codes for another (diagnostic shift) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%