The Rise, Regulation and Risks of Genetically Modified Insect Technology in Global Agriculture

Abstract

The article explores the rise, regulation and risks of genetically modified (GM) insect technology in global agriculture. It contributes to the debate on the nexus of science, technology and food security in Science and Technology Studies from an International Relations perspective. The study locates GM insect technology within the context of conceptual debates about global agriculture, transnational entrepreneurship and the pooling of different sources of political authority. It introduces the pooling of political authority as a potential causal mechanism that transmits biotechnical innovations and entrepreneurship to the spread of GM insect technology in the global agri-food regime. The study focusses, especially on Oxitec Limited, the most important business entrepreneur in the field. The empirical findings reveal that Oxitec has pooled moral and technical political authority and has influenced the global rise and regulation of GM insect technology. The contribution discusses the implications of Oxitec’s entrepreneurial involvement and identifies the three key challenges concerning the global regulation of GM insect technology: the transboundary scope, the provision of transparency, and the assessment of risks. Finally, the study outlines future areas of research.

SDG Implementation through Technology? Governing Food-Water-Technology Nexus Challenges in Urban Agriculture

“…This article contributes to current debates on global goal implementation, technology innovation, and cross-sectoral governance (Liu et al, 2015;Pradhan, Costa, Rybski, Lucht, & Kropp, 2017;Sachs et al, 2019). We assume that innovative technologies can contribute to SDG implementation, but simultaneously fuel new sector interlinkages and governance challenges (Schwindenhammer, 2020). Applying a foodwater-technology nexus (FWTN) perspective, we conduct a case study on an emerging technology in urban agricultural production in Germany.…”

Significance and Vision of Nutrient Recovery for Sustainable City Food Systems in Germany by 2050

“…Consumers' growing attentiveness to (local) food issues is reinforced by digital approaches to enhance transparency in food supply chains, e.g., digital food tracking and tracing measures, online food blogs and food assessment portals [95]. There is especially an ongoing debate on the potential of blockchain technology and artificial intelligence to further enhance food supply chain transparency [96].…”

From the Lab to the Last Mile: Deploying Transgenic Approaches Against Mosquitoes

“…The company has been criticized for allegedly not being transparent about their and the US EPA's review process, which Oxitec has rebutted. However, this criticism echoes those leveled against the agricultural company Monsanto and points to a crucial need to be seen to be transparent in order to build public confidence and reduce mistrust (43). There have also been concerns that releases may not turn out as expected, as happened in a trial at Brazil, which saw some hybridization and introgression of genetic elements from Oxitec mosquitoes into the wild population (44).…”

“…They propose conducting economic evaluations to compare alternative courses of action as a basis for making sound decisions. However, the major risk assessment challenge is the need for a political answer as to how to interpret the precautionary principle in the global context of rapid technological changes capable of altering entire ecosystems (43,66). There is a body of opinion that a new neutral globally harmonized regulatory system is required which would need to be trusted, transparent and enforceable, with punitive liabilities.…”