2001
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6443.00141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rise of the Information State: the Development of Central State Surveillance of the Citizen in England, 1500–2000

Abstract: This essay examines existing sociological explanations of the development of the central surveillance of citizens in the light of the English experience, and finds them wanting. Sociologists see the state using surveillance for the benefit of capitalist elites, to reimpose social control over the ''society of strangers'' created by industrialisation. But surveillance pre-dated industrialisation, and the development of information gathering by state elites had more to do with their own need to preserve their po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of technologies and sciences during this period rendered humans and environments countable and knowable at increasingly large scales (Ball et al, 2012;Bowler, 2000;Foucault, 1970Foucault, , 2007Higgs, 2001;Scott, 1998). Interwoven with such practical means, newly dominant mechanistic philosophies seemed to offer European elites the key to finally master nature, to turn it to human politics and industry-both in Europe and in rapidly expanding colonial networks (Césaire, 1972;Delbourgo, 2008;Gottschalk, 2013;Grove, 1996;Reidy & Rozwadowski, 2014).…”
Section: From Kin To Thingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of technologies and sciences during this period rendered humans and environments countable and knowable at increasingly large scales (Ball et al, 2012;Bowler, 2000;Foucault, 1970Foucault, , 2007Higgs, 2001;Scott, 1998). Interwoven with such practical means, newly dominant mechanistic philosophies seemed to offer European elites the key to finally master nature, to turn it to human politics and industry-both in Europe and in rapidly expanding colonial networks (Césaire, 1972;Delbourgo, 2008;Gottschalk, 2013;Grove, 1996;Reidy & Rozwadowski, 2014).…”
Section: From Kin To Thingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact has raised some ethical concerns among institutional review boards (ethics committees), especially those that view the collection and analysis of open source information without the express consent of the posters to be ethically problematic (Gearon & Parsons, 2019;Hribar et al, 2014). However, the de-privatized nature of posting to public or ungated spaces on the internet assumes that posters should be, at a minimum, aware that whatever they post is public information and can be surveilled by state agents (Higgs, 2001;Reidenberg, 2014). The imposition of hurdles, which researchers must overcome to collect and use open source data, is antithetical to the production of knowledge.…”
Section: Why Are Crowdsourced and Open Source Data Valuable?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higgs, 2001;Gilliom, 2001;Lyon, 1994) and collective welfare (e.g. Sackett, 1993;Manderson, 1999;Glaser, 2000), and cautioned citizens about the dangers posed by crime (e.g.…”
Section: Justifying Government Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%