2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rise of mobile computing for Group Decision Support Systems: A comparative evaluation of mobile and desktop

Abstract: The use of desktop technologies, opposed to their mobile counterparts, is still predominant in the business domain and daily corporate activities. For complex business tasks, the usability of mobile applications is still perceived as inferior. Nevertheless, mobile computing could support work activities in different ways. This research seeks to explore whether mobile applications, especially sophisticated real-time groupware such as Group Decision Support Systems can match or even outperform their desktop-base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(iii) Identify the internal mechanisms used by flexible companies to organize ideas in a collaborative environment, as well as priorities, and facilitating conflict resolution [11]; our paper aims to fill this gap by showing that a firm with greater flexibility and better-enabled communication will achieve more efficient decision-making processes. (iv) Determine how to take advantage of this flexibility within the company and to strengthen potential and realized absorptive capacity to obtain organizational innovation throughout the organization [9, [12][13][14][15][16]. Such exploitation involves enabling organizational innovation throughout the firm by increasing flexible organizational design and the number of more knowledgeable individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) Identify the internal mechanisms used by flexible companies to organize ideas in a collaborative environment, as well as priorities, and facilitating conflict resolution [11]; our paper aims to fill this gap by showing that a firm with greater flexibility and better-enabled communication will achieve more efficient decision-making processes. (iv) Determine how to take advantage of this flexibility within the company and to strengthen potential and realized absorptive capacity to obtain organizational innovation throughout the organization [9, [12][13][14][15][16]. Such exploitation involves enabling organizational innovation throughout the firm by increasing flexible organizational design and the number of more knowledgeable individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People could not get face to face communication which limits mimics and body expressions. This may result in loss of reliability among working team members responsible for business projects and thus the group members may hesitate to share their individual ideas (Wang and Reani, 2017). This impersonality issue may also lead to miscommunication and misunderstandings due to the lack of body and facial expressions.…”
Section: The Disadvantages Of Groupware Systems To Organizational Commentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, IT could assist decision-makers by involving different team members and stakeholders in the process, thus considering different perspectives to the selection criteria. Groupware technologies such as e-collaborative systems and group decision support systems [55] could be used to gather opinions anonymously and making more transparent decisions. Having said that, it is noteworthy that this study was conducted in a strongly democratic country with low power distance [23].…”
Section: Facilitating Transparent and Democratic Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%