The rise of income and the demise of class and social status? A systematic review of measures of socio-economic position in stratification research

Barone, Carlo; Hertel, Forian R.; Smallenbroek, Oscar

doi:10.31235/osf.io/rpfza

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, the encouraging results of previous validation studies and the four desirable properties of these class schemes identified in this study constitute compelling arguments against such a drastic solution. The overriding dominance of EGP-like schemes in class analysis in recent years (Barone et al 2020) testifies to their persistent popularity among empirical researchers. Based on our results, we therefore identify three pragmatic ways to proceed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Even according to Erikson and Goldthorpe themselves ESEC should supersede EGP (personal communication). However, EGP continues to prevail in current stratification research (Barone et al 2020). In the absence of validation studies contrasting the two schemes other than the volume that introduced ESEC (Rose and Harrison 2010), there is little justification for either choice.…”

Section: Figure 3: Egp-like Class Scheme Assignment Procedures and Employment Relations Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Measuring Class Hierarchies in Postindustrial Societies: A criterion and construct validation of EGP and ESEC across 31 countries

Smallenbroek¹,

Hertel²,

Barone³

2021

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In social stratification research, the most frequently used social class schema are based on employment relations (EGP and ESEC). These schemes have been propelled to paradigms for research on social mobility and educational inequalities and applied in cross-national research for both genders. Using the European Working Conditions Survey, we examine their criterion and construct validity across 31 countries and for both genders. We investigate whether classes are well-delineated by the theoretically assumed dimensions of employment relations and we assess how several measures of occupational advantage differ across classes. We find broad similarity in the criterion validity of EGP and ESEC across genders and countries as well as satisfactory levels of construct validity. However, the salariat classes are too heterogeneous and their boundaries with the intermediate classes are blurred. To improve the measurement of social class, we propose to differentiate managerial and professional occupations within the lower and higher salariat respectively. We show that implementing these distinctions in ESEC and EGP improves their criterion validity and allows to better identify privileged positions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Figure 3: Egp-like Class Scheme Assignment Procedures and Employment Relations Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring Class Hierarchies in Postindustrial Societies: A criterion and construct validation of EGP and ESEC across 31 countries

Smallenbroek¹,

Hertel²,

Barone³

2021

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Goldthorpe (Rose & Harrison, 2010: 10-23) (Barone et al, 2021;Birkelund, Goodman, & Rose, 1996;Evans, 1992Evans, , 1996Evans & Mills, 1998;Rose & Harrison, 2010). Sie (oder eine ihrer vielen nationalen Varianten) bilden damit das am häufigsten validierte und angewandte Klassenschema in soziologischen Ungleichheitsanalysen (Barone et al, 2021). (Rose & Harrison, 2010: 21).…”

unclassified

Was (ver-)messen eigentlich Klassen? Zum Zusammenhang zwischen unterschiedlicher Operationalisierung sozialer Klassen und ihrer Erklärungskraft mit Blick auf Stratifikation und Ungleichheit in Deutschland

Hertel¹

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Deutsch: Darüber, wie die soziale Position in einer Gesellschaft am besten gemessen werden sollte, besteht keine Einigkeit. Da die Operationalisierung jedoch weitreichende Folgen für Forschungsdesign und Interpretation der Ergebnisse hat, werden hier sieben Konzeptionen sozialer Positionen auf ihre Erklärungskraft für ganz unterschiedliche Phänomene hin verglichen. Die Analyse sucht damit die vor allem methodische Frage zu beantworten, ob und wie sich die einzelnen Klassenmessungen in ihrer Erklärungskraft bezüglich Stratifikation und Klassenungleichheit bei 35 Eigenschaften von rund 25.000 Allbus-Befragten in Deutschland unterscheiden. Die Ergebnisse weisen darauf hin, dass Klassenzugehörigkeit Menschen nur in wenigen der hier untersuchten Eigenschaften wirklich stratifiziert. Gleichzeitig lassen sich aber bedeutende Klassenungleichheiten bei objektiven Statusindikatoren und intergenerationalen Mobilitätsmessungen finden. Während insgesamt Mikroklassen die höchste Erklärungskraft aufweisen, sind die Unterschiede in Bereichen, in denen aggregierte Klassifikationen eine besondere Erklärungsleistung für sich beanspruchen, marginal. Die Ergebnisse empfehlen neben den quasi paradigmatischen ESEC-Klassen auch andere der hier vorgestellten Klassifizierungen ergänzend in der Ungleichheitsanalyse einzusetzen. English: There is little agreement how to best measure social class position in contemporary societies. The chosen measurement, however, has substantial implications for a study‘s design and the interpretation of its findings. Therefore, I empirically compare the explanatory power of nine alternative social class concepts regarding their ability to map stratification and identify class inequality. The analysis is repeated for 35 characteristics measured in the Allbus data 1980 to 2018 for almost 25,000 individuals. Results indicate that class membership stratifies only few of the studied attributes. At the same time class concepts are able to detect meaningful class inequality especially in terms of but not limited to objective SES measures and social mobility indicators. While microclasses outperform more aggregated class measures in general, the differences are rather small in subject areas for which the latter theoretically claim particular explanatory power. In the spirit of parsimony, the results hence would seem to suggest the use of the more aggregated classifications at least with regard to some subject matters. I suggest to complement the almost exclusive usage of ESEC in contemporary stratification research with alternative class measures.

show abstract

The rise of income and the demise of class and social status? A systematic review of measures of socio-economic position in stratification research

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Measuring Class Hierarchies in Postindustrial Societies: A criterion and construct validation of EGP and ESEC across 31 countries

Measuring Class Hierarchies in Postindustrial Societies: A criterion and construct validation of EGP and ESEC across 31 countries

Was (ver-)messen eigentlich Klassen? Zum Zusammenhang zwischen unterschiedlicher Operationalisierung sozialer Klassen und ihrer Erklärungskraft mit Blick auf Stratifikation und Ungleichheit in Deutschland

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About