Digitisation Perspectives 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6091-299-3_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rise of Digitization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent decades, digitization of cultural heritage sites has become a keenly studied topic (Evens & Hauttekeete, 2011) with pilot projects in existence since the late 1980s and early 1990s (Terras, 2011). Assessing and evaluating the extent to which a digital library satisfies the needs of its users are the most frequently used evaluation paradigms for digital libraries (Kelly, 2014;Todd-Diaz & O'Hare, 2014) as well as for digital museums and cultural heritage sites (e.g., Barbieri, Bruno & Muzzupappa, 2017;Artese, Ciocca & Gagliardi, 2017).…”
Section: Cultural Heritage Digital Libraries and User Experience Evalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, digitization of cultural heritage sites has become a keenly studied topic (Evens & Hauttekeete, 2011) with pilot projects in existence since the late 1980s and early 1990s (Terras, 2011). Assessing and evaluating the extent to which a digital library satisfies the needs of its users are the most frequently used evaluation paradigms for digital libraries (Kelly, 2014;Todd-Diaz & O'Hare, 2014) as well as for digital museums and cultural heritage sites (e.g., Barbieri, Bruno & Muzzupappa, 2017;Artese, Ciocca & Gagliardi, 2017).…”
Section: Cultural Heritage Digital Libraries and User Experience Evalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not that it is necessary for all classicists to be digital classicists; the techniques and technologies described here intersect with more traditional close-reading methods, and both approaches are needed within the community. It is worth noting too that undertaking research that crosses disciplinary boundaries between computing and classical studies brings its own logistical, practical, and personal issues, such as negotiating different academic cultures; finding appropriate publication venues; developing robust promotion and tenure cases; developing adequate skills; and recruiting, training, and maintaining staff who can straddle both camps (Barker 2013;Terras 2010b). Nevertheless, those working in this area are increasing both the usability and visibility of classics-related information in the networked environment and changing the scope and reach of questions we can ask of the sources.…”
Section: Back To the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, at the technical level, the adoption of deep learning architectures and the usage of embedded language representations greatly reshapes the field and opens up new research directions [2,27,26]. Second, with respect to application domain and language spectrum, NE processing has been called upon to contribute to the field of Digital Humanities (DH), where massive digitization of historical documents is producing huge amounts of texts [50]. Thanks to largescale digitization projects driven by cultural institutions, millions of images are being acquired and, when it comes to text, their content is transcribed, either manually via dedicated interfaces, or automatically via Optical Character Recognition (OCR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%