Abstract:What legal rights and duties immigrants should have is among the most ferociously debated topics in the politics of liberal societies today. However, as this article will show, there is remarkably little disagreement of great magnitude among political theorists and philosophers of immigration on the rights and duties of resident immigrants (even in contrast to the closely related philosophical discussion of justice in immigrant admissions). Specifically, this article will survey philosophical positions both on… Show more
“…Closer to the issue of this paper is the debate over so-called 'obligatory integration measures', that is, legal requirements immigrants have to fulfil, such as to take an integration course (see Michalowski and Oers 2011; for the normative debate, see Higgins 2018). According to a plausible view, states may legitimately implement such laws only if immigrants have a moral duty to learn the host society's language.…”
Section: The Debate On Linguistic Justice and Moral Duties Of Immigrantsmentioning
In many Western countries, the host society expects immigrants to learn the official language and often reacts in severe ways if they do not. One of the normative questions that arise in this context is whether immigrants have a moral duty to learn the host society’s language. The paper evaluates the four most promising arguments for why immigrants might have such a duty: respect towards the host society; the unavoidability of communication situations involving duties; the duty to avoid becoming reliant on assistance from the welfare system; and a contract between the host society and immigrants. The paper argues that only the third and the fourth arguments support a moral obligation, and that they do so subject to several conditions and only for particular groups of immigrants.
“…Closer to the issue of this paper is the debate over so-called 'obligatory integration measures', that is, legal requirements immigrants have to fulfil, such as to take an integration course (see Michalowski and Oers 2011; for the normative debate, see Higgins 2018). According to a plausible view, states may legitimately implement such laws only if immigrants have a moral duty to learn the host society's language.…”
Section: The Debate On Linguistic Justice and Moral Duties Of Immigrantsmentioning
In many Western countries, the host society expects immigrants to learn the official language and often reacts in severe ways if they do not. One of the normative questions that arise in this context is whether immigrants have a moral duty to learn the host society’s language. The paper evaluates the four most promising arguments for why immigrants might have such a duty: respect towards the host society; the unavoidability of communication situations involving duties; the duty to avoid becoming reliant on assistance from the welfare system; and a contract between the host society and immigrants. The paper argues that only the third and the fourth arguments support a moral obligation, and that they do so subject to several conditions and only for particular groups of immigrants.
Although many writers in political philosophy argue for open borders, the question of what this entails for nonideal worlds has not yet been adequately addressed. Two diverging positions can be discerned in the literature. On the one hand, writers such as Joseph Carens emphasize that borders should only be open under ideal circumstances, and that the Open Borders Claim does not at the present moment justify pursuing a political program. On the other hand, writers such as Andreas Cassee and Kieran Oberman argue that states should open their borders immediately to a great extent. This paper argues against both positions, and sets out an intermediate approach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.