1996
DOI: 10.1093/ijrl/8.4.532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Right to Return of Palestinians in International Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, UN Resolution 242 talks about a ‘just settlement’ to the refugee problem without addressing the specific solution that appears in United Nations General Assembly Resolution (UNGAR) 194 which continues to be a basis of the right of return (Bracka, 2005). Erroneous claims from Israeli scholars that most villages and property left behind in 1948 were destroyed, occupied by settlers, or transformed are intended to reinforce the claim that the return of refugees is impossible (Lawand, 1996). As Don Peretz (1993: 73) states, ‘well-informed Palestinians are aware that conditions have changed .…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, UN Resolution 242 talks about a ‘just settlement’ to the refugee problem without addressing the specific solution that appears in United Nations General Assembly Resolution (UNGAR) 194 which continues to be a basis of the right of return (Bracka, 2005). Erroneous claims from Israeli scholars that most villages and property left behind in 1948 were destroyed, occupied by settlers, or transformed are intended to reinforce the claim that the return of refugees is impossible (Lawand, 1996). As Don Peretz (1993: 73) states, ‘well-informed Palestinians are aware that conditions have changed .…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%