The Right to Be Forgotten Across the Pond

Ambrose, Meg Leta; Ausloos, Jef

doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.3.2013.0001

Cited by 50 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 3 publications

(2 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Inserido no campo protetivo da privacidade, o direito ao esquecimento consiste, de forma ampla, em uma prerrogativa jurídica do indivíduo em apagar ou ocultar determinadas informações pessoais ou mesmo exigir de terceiros o seu não compartilhamento com o escopo de assegurar sua autonomia informacional e autogovernar a própria memória (Ambrose;Ausloos, 2013;Sarlet, 2018).…”

Section: Palavras-chaveunclassified

“…A primeira é tratada como direito ao esquecimento em sentido estrito ("right to oblivion"), isto é, a dissociação do indivíduo com um passado ilícito, criminoso. A segunda concepção é do direito de apagar ("right to erasure"), a qual indica a faculdade da pessoa em apagar definitivamente informações que lhe dizem respeito de algum banco de dados (Ambrose;Ausloos, 2013). Esta última acepção ganha relevância e atenção com as tecnologias da informação e o meio virtual, pois possibilitam uma coleta indiscriminada, uma manutenção eterna e incontáveis possibilidades de processamento dos dados pessoais (Mendes, 2014).…”

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

DIREITO AO ESQUECIMENTO RELOADED: inconsistências normativas e teóricas de sua aplicação no ambiente digital

Catib de Laurentiis,

Grizotto Ferreira,

Napolitano

2023

Rev.Observ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O trabalho investiga a possibilidade jurídica de enquadrar os provedores de busca como destinatários do direito ao esquecimento, imputando-lhes o ônus de instituir filtros ou mecanismos capazes de suprimir determinados resultados relacionados a dados pessoais. Já amplamente discutido na Europa, a questão ganhou relevância no Brasil com os julgamentos do Recurso Especial 1.660.168, pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) e do Recurso Extraordinário 1.010.606, pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). O trabalho, em uma abordagem jurídico-dogmática, descreve e analisa criticamente os julgados, identificando inconsistências para utilização da decisão do STJ como precedente válido, dificuldades para a sua implementação, conflitos entre as decisões e uso acrítico do precedente europeu.

show abstract

Section: Palavras-chaveunclassified

unclassified

DIREITO AO ESQUECIMENTO RELOADED: inconsistências normativas e teóricas de sua aplicação no ambiente digital

Catib de Laurentiis,

Grizotto Ferreira,

Napolitano

2023

Rev.Observ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, while these definitions may seem fairly straightforward, they faced a number of criticisms from legal scholars. For example, Meg Leta Ambrose and Jef Ausloos (2013) argued that the ‘Proposal’ was open to misinterpretation within the European Data Protection Regulation framework and risked conflating the droit à l’oubli (right to oblivion) with the right to erasure (RtE):The two have led to much confusion. Oblivion is founded upon protections against harm to dignity, personality, reputation, and identity but has the potential to collide with other fundamental rights.…”

Section: The Rtbfmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Erasure, on the contrary, refers to mechanized data created passively and is not intended to apply to content created by others. Time is also a factor here; oblivion allows information to be less accessible with time, whereas erasure is not necessarily time-dependent (Ambrose and Ausloos, 2013: 15). Because it involves the removal of publicly available data, the RtE is legally distinct from privacy rights, which require that data are inaccessible in the public realm (EC, 2014a).…”

Section: The Rtbfmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collective memory or the right to be forgotten? Cultures of digital memory and forgetting in the European Union

Stainforth

2021

Memory Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article investigates cultures of digital memory and forgetting in the European Union. The article first gives some background to key debates in media memory studies, before going on to analyse the shaping of European Commission and European Union initiatives in relation to Google’s activities from the period 2004–present. The focus of inquiry for the discussion of memory is the Google Books project and Europeana, a database of digitized cultural collections drawn from European museums, libraries and archives. Attention is then given to questions of forgetting by exploring the tension between Google’s search and indexing mechanisms and the right to be forgotten. The article ends by reflecting on the scale of the shift in contemporary cultures of memory and forgetting, and considers how far European regulation enables possible interventions in this domain.

show abstract

“…retention), the right to be forgotten goes a step further by giving users the ability to withdraw consent. Therefore, the right to be forgotten (or its diluted form, the "right to erasure"; Ambrose & Ausloos, 2013), should be an integral part of future PbD guidelines.…”

Section: Pbd Guidelines Should Be More User-centricmentioning

confidence: 99%

Data, data and even more data : empowering users to make well-informed decisions about online privacy

Barth¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

particular context and focusing on actual use of data and intended outcomes of data gathering might prove successful. To date, the balance between granularity and generalization of contexts remains unresolved (Solove, 2002). However, regulations specifying concrete conditions for processing personal data "are the decisive test for discerning whether [or not] society is aware of this price and willing to pay it. If the signs of experience are correct, this payment can be delayed no further" (Simitis, 1987; p. 746). Beyond access control and authentication:A technical perspective on information privacy "Computers constantly produce data. It's their input and output, but it's also a by-product of everything they do…they sense and record more than you're aware of" (Schneier, 2015, p. 15).The era of big data and unprecedented interconnectivity has allowed companies to amass datasets containing incredible amounts of personal information. By recording, storing, tracking and linking events over time, computers are able to identify patterns and gain insights into the individual preferences, interests or personal characteristics of users. As a result, behavioral tracking-and the profiling it makes possible-stand to become one of the most serious threats to privacy ever known.Techniques such as browser cookies and tracking 'pixels' allow monitoring the behavior of individual users across the internet. Cookies were designed to allow websites to recognize visitors to provide features such as automatic login, shopping carts, language settings, or saving preferences. However, advertising companies are increasingly using this technology on a large scale to record the activity of users across a large number of websites (Castelluccia, 2012;Nikiforakis et al., 2013). They do so by asking website owners to insert a small script (also known as a 'tracking pixel') into their pages in exchange for usage statistics. This allows advertising companies to create surprisingly accurate profiles of individuals based on their online behavior, potentially including information they might not even be aware of themselves (Gutwirth & Hildebrandt, 2008). These profiles are usually used to target ads, but they are also sold and shared, enabling discrimination and manipulation (Lyon, 2003;Zarsky, 2019). This kind of tracking is often invisible to users. Even if cookies are disabled or blocked, 'fingerprinting' allows tracking scripts to identify individuals based on specific configurations that are unique to the browser. This allows tracking users between 24 | Chapter 1 2 The privacy paradox -Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior -A systematic literature review Barth, S., & De Jong, M. D. T. (2017). The privacy paradox -Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior -A systematic literature review.

show abstract

The Right to Be Forgotten Across the Pond

Cited by 50 publications

References 3 publications

DIREITO AO ESQUECIMENTO RELOADED: inconsistências normativas e teóricas de sua aplicação no ambiente digital

DIREITO AO ESQUECIMENTO RELOADED: inconsistências normativas e teóricas de sua aplicação no ambiente digital

Collective memory or the right to be forgotten? Cultures of digital memory and forgetting in the European Union

Data, data and even more data : empowering users to make well-informed decisions about online privacy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About