The right of servitude between public interest and undisturbed use of private property

Abstract

For obtaining the land in order to build the magistral pipeline a specific form of land expropriation is applied, namely the Right of servitude. The Right of servitude can be realized on the basis of established public interest, which can be defined according to the spatial plan of the relevant area. The Right of servitude is analyzed from the point of its influence on the respect of basic human rights of property owners to enjoy their property in safety and without disturbance. Current legal framework in Serbia that regulates procedures for acquiring land for the purpose of public interest allows for breach of private property rights. There is a mutual inconsistency between a number of decrees that regulate property rights for large infrastructural development projects. A specific, and possibly a greater problem, is the status of the local population, the land owner and other real estate. It concerns their awareness of their private and individual rights, as well as technical and other legal standards, which must be applied during the preparation, construction and working stages of an energy facility. Applying the Right of servitude as a way to acquire land for construction of the Pipeline, there is direct breach of the basic human right as stated in the first Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights, namely that ‘every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions’ (Article 1, Protocol 1). The Right of servitude allows the investor to use ‘public interest’ as a way of gaining access to another’s land, and under better financial conditions than if he were to apply permanent expropriation. While the owner retains his/her ownership of the land, inconvenienced by numerous limitations of its use, usability and market value of the land becomes substantially reduced

Displacement and climate change: improving planning policy and increasing community resilience

“…In regard to public participation within the planning process, it should be stressed that the participation is limited to public hearings (Law on Planning and Construction, articles 45a, 50, 51) and that the Law does “not oblige the developer of the Plan to cooperate with the local community and civil society” (Petovar and Jokic, 2011, p. 10). On the other hand, relevant authorities (organizations and public companies authorized to determine special conditions for the protection and regulation and construction of buildings, for protection of water courses, hydrometeorological and seismological institutions, etc.)…”

Challenging Issues of the Establishment of a Public Servitude on Land Plots for Placement of Linear Facilities

“…Efficient legal regulation of placement of linear facilities means that legal instruments that consolidate the right to use other person's land plots reflect the specific nature of such activities, facilitate the development of systems of linear facilities and ensure a balance of interests of owners of linear facilities and title holders of land plots. The last criterion is especially significant in the evaluation of the legal regulation efficiency [1,2].…”

Land use regulation and property rights regime over land in Serbia

“…In former (real) socialist states public interest was an instrument for enabling various activities, and carriers of those rights were clearly defined -only actors from the state/common sector could be the beneficiaries of public interest(Petovar and Jokić, 2011).3 It should be pointed out here that some EU countries (e.g., Hungary, Lithuania, Slovakia) are making great efforts to delay the entry into force of the SAA provisions regarding enabling foreigners to acquire agricultural land, in order to prevent the misuse of agricultural land(Živanović Miljković, 2014).…”