The right of access to and enjoyment of cultural heritage – Report 2011 (A/HRC/17/38)

Belder, Lucky

doi:10.4337/9781786435422.00009

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Internationally recognized, the right of access to cultural heritage is approached differently in different countries (Belder 2017;D'Addetta 2017;Durbach and Lixinski 2017;Jokilehto 2012). In its domains of application, this issue of the right of access to cultural heritage is often apprehended in association with (i) the recognition of cultural diversity (Durbach and Lixinski 2017), (ii) the access and protection of cultural heritage during armed conflicts (Assi 2012;Kraak 2018;Stone 2012) (Ndlovu 2009(Ndlovu , 2011(Ndlovu , 2016Taruvinga 2005;Taruvinga and Ndoro 2003).…”

Section: Diverging Perceptions Of Heritage Access Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Janus-faced Dilemma of Rock Art Heritage Management in Europe: A Double Dialectic Process between Conservation and Public Outreach, Transmission and Exclusion

Duval

Gauchon

2019

Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we discuss the management strategies applied to rock art in western cultural contexts. How do the persons responsible for rock art sites manage the tension between the two opposing imperatives of, on one side, their conservation and long-term transmission, and the other, their opening to the public to enable their heritage value to be shared and transmitted in the present? What forms do the articulation of conservation and public access take? Drawing on a typology of the many possible configurations, we discuss the choices made by the actors in charge of decorated sites, as well as the variability of some of the criteria considered, such as the 'carrying capacity' of a site, to define visit protocols. We thus demonstrate that the implementation of quotas depends not only on climatic and biochemical factors but on the priorities of the decision-makers and their interpretation of the preservation of a decorated site as well. Finally, our empirical approach leads to a discussion of the accessibility of rock art sites from the angle of heritage access rights and the heritage-making process. What meaning do we ascribe to sites that remain closed and thus cannot be experienced by the public? To what degree are they (still?) heritage sites and for whom? Through an empirical and comparative approach, we address these questions based on an analysis of case studies in France and northern Spain.

show abstract

Section: Diverging Perceptions Of Heritage Access Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Janus-faced Dilemma of Rock Art Heritage Management in Europe: A Double Dialectic Process between Conservation and Public Outreach, Transmission and Exclusion

Duval

Gauchon

2019

Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Malicious Activity in Cyberarea as a Ground for Introduction of Sanctions: Theory and Practice

Douhan

2022

Journal of International Law and International Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Current article provides an overview of the practice of application of sanctions both of the UN Security Council and by states and regional organisations unilaterally with reference to malicious activity in cyberspace. Article idefines the notion of ‘sanctions’ in international law, refers to specific cases of malicious activity, practice of the use of sanctions by the UN Security Council and by states and regional organisations unilaterally, follows recent developments of legislation of the United States of America, European Union, United Kingdom and Australia; identifies contemporary tendencies and applicable areas of international law. The author identifies on the conclusion contemporary problems of the use of international and cybersanctions in cyberarea.

show abstract

The Return of Fossils Removed Under Colonial Rule

Stewens

Raja

Dunne

2022

Santander Art and Culture Law Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Debates on the restitution of colonial loot usually focus on art, antiquities, religious artefacts, and similar objects. Many fossils of considerable scientific and cultural value were also removed under colonial rule, yet they rarely feature in these discussions despite being classified as cultural objects. This article seeks to shed light on the colonial removal of fossils and explore potential avenues for their return under public international law. Instead of focusing on the (il-)legality of colonial takings, we argue that the right to access culture has developed from the right to participate in cultural life in Article 15(1)(a) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), which provides, if not a solid legal basis, a valuable set of arguments for former colonies requesting the return of fossils looted from their countries/territories of origin. The case study of the negotiations on the return of the Broken Hill skull before the UNESCO Intergovernmental Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to its Countries of Origin or its Restitution in Case of Illicit Appropriation (ICPRCP) highlights the potential of this mechanism of dispute resolution with respect to fossils.

show abstract

The right of access to and enjoyment of cultural heritage – Report 2011 (A/HRC/17/38)

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

The Janus-faced Dilemma of Rock Art Heritage Management in Europe: A Double Dialectic Process between Conservation and Public Outreach, Transmission and Exclusion

The Janus-faced Dilemma of Rock Art Heritage Management in Europe: A Double Dialectic Process between Conservation and Public Outreach, Transmission and Exclusion

Malicious Activity in Cyberarea as a Ground for Introduction of Sanctions: Theory and Practice

The Return of Fossils Removed Under Colonial Rule

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About