The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m900818200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The RIG-I-like Receptor LGP2 Recognizes the Termini of Double-stranded RNA

Abstract: The RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs), RIG-I and MDA5, recognize single-stranded RNA with 5 triphosphates and doublestranded RNA (dsRNA) to initiate innate antiviral immune responses.LGP2, a homolog of RIG-I and MDA5 that lacks signaling capability, regulates the signaling of the RLRs. To establish the structural basis of dsRNA recognition by the RLRs, we have determined the 2.0-Å resolution crystal structure of human LGP2 C-terminal domain bound to an 8-bp dsRNA. Two LGP2 C-terminal domain molecules bind to the ter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

8
165
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(66 reference statements)
8
165
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The FLAG‐tagged CTD of LGP2 was able to co‐IP Dicer, unlike two different NTD fragments (Fig 2B). Mutation of a conserved lysine residue near the C‐terminus of LGP2 (K634), which has previously been shown to prevent RNA binding (Li et al , 2009; Pippig et al , 2009), reduced the association of the CTD of LGP2 with Dicer (Fig 2C). However, mutation of the same residue within the context of the full‐length protein weakened but did not abolish binding to Dicer, suggesting that the N‐terminal helicase domain, although by itself unable to bind Dicer, stabilises the interaction between the CTD and Dicer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FLAG‐tagged CTD of LGP2 was able to co‐IP Dicer, unlike two different NTD fragments (Fig 2B). Mutation of a conserved lysine residue near the C‐terminus of LGP2 (K634), which has previously been shown to prevent RNA binding (Li et al , 2009; Pippig et al , 2009), reduced the association of the CTD of LGP2 with Dicer (Fig 2C). However, mutation of the same residue within the context of the full‐length protein weakened but did not abolish binding to Dicer, suggesting that the N‐terminal helicase domain, although by itself unable to bind Dicer, stabilises the interaction between the CTD and Dicer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Importantly, the inhibitory effect was unique to LGP2, as inclusion of FLAG‐tagged MDA5 or FLAG‐tagged RIG‐I had little effect on dicing efficiency (Figs 4C and EV3C). In contrast to full‐length LGP2, purified LGP2 CTD only modestly decreased in vitro dicing of dsRNA despite its ability to associate with Dicer and to bind dsRNA with high affinity (Li et al , 2009; Pippig et al , 2009; Figs 4D and EV3D). Furthermore, there was little difference between the LGP2 CTD and a CTD K634E mutant, which completely lacks RNA binding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the facts that RIG-I detects 5 0 -triphosphate-containg RNA [6,7] and Lgp2 binds to the termini of dsRNA [19], we raised the hypothesis that the 5 0 -end of DNA may be a critical determinant for cytosolic recognition. To test this hypothesis, we generated four different ISD variants: (i) ISD containing a free 5 0 -hydroxyl group (ISD-OH), (ii) ISD in vitro phosphorylated at the 5 0 -end (ISD-P; [20]), (iii) ISD blocked at the 5 0 -end by addition of a biotin group (ISD-Bio) and (iv) ISD blocked at the 5 0 -end by addition of an amino group (ISD-NH2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LGP2 mutant K651E was based on the observation that mutation of LGP2 lysine 651 to glutamic acid completely disrupts RNA recognition by the isolated C-terminal RD (20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%