2006
DOI: 10.1080/00393541.2006.11650500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rhizomatic Relations of A/r/tography

Abstract: Copyright �006 by the �tudies in ��rt �ducation National ��rt �ducation ��ssociation �� Journal of �ssues and Research �006�� 48����� �0-88

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
25

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
68
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, faculty may experience an evolving sense of individual and social identity shaped by the international context. In these connective spaces (Irwin et al 2006;Pourchier 2010), innovative perspectives and practices abound. Creative productivity is found at the intersection of the personal and the professional, and the individual and the collective.…”
Section: Cultivate Global Communities Of Unique Individualsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this work, faculty may experience an evolving sense of individual and social identity shaped by the international context. In these connective spaces (Irwin et al 2006;Pourchier 2010), innovative perspectives and practices abound. Creative productivity is found at the intersection of the personal and the professional, and the individual and the collective.…”
Section: Cultivate Global Communities Of Unique Individualsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Calling this the "in-between," Kelly cited both the value and need for the creation of in-process spaces where students might view learning as an incessant search (Greene, 1995). Springgay (2008) and Irwin et al (2006) discuss such inprocess spaces as rhizomatically interstitial, where "creating, teaching, learning and researching [are] in a constant state of becoming" (p. 71). Not relegated to students, we also see the instructor as situated in-between, moving alongside students in a collaborative quest for knowing (Greene, 1995;Sochacka, Guyotte, & Walther, 2016).…”
Section: Artful Value: Learning and Knowing As Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…ved at deltagerne er medbestemmende i dagsorden og refleksionstemaer og kombinationen af de naevnte tilgange. Isaer den etnografiske dimension som en fundamental plank of EAR (Tacchi et al, 2009, s. 32) skaber visse ligheder med kollaborativ etnografi (Lassiter, 2005), men tilgangen laener sig også op ad A/r/tography (Irwin et al, 2006) på grund af den aktive forskerdeltagelse. Det, der trods ligheder, skiller EAR fra de to andre naevnte tilgange er kravet om forandring og vekselvirkning mellem aktion og refleksion.…”
Section: At Forske Med Mennesker: Etnografisk Aktionsforskning Og Refunclassified
“…Desuden kan der i hervaerende forskning ikke argumenteres for A/r/tography, fordi der som det første ikke arbejdes frem mod egentlige udstillinger (f.eks. i gallerier, som i Irwin et al, 2006), og for det andet fordi jeg ikke er kunstner (de Cosson, 2002).…”
Section: At Forske Med Mennesker: Etnografisk Aktionsforskning Og Refunclassified