2020
DOI: 10.17223/19986645/68/6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rhetorical Structure Theory as the Instrument for Analyzing Poetic Texts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process of adapting RST for the specificity of poetic texts includes two steps: (1) defining the criteria for dividing an analyzed text into the sequence of elementary segments, (2) elaborating the appropriate set of rhetorical relations and the criteria for their textual identification. Since both lines were in focus of consideration in [24], it would be superfluous to discuss them here again. It is sufficient to characterize the main results of the adaptation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The process of adapting RST for the specificity of poetic texts includes two steps: (1) defining the criteria for dividing an analyzed text into the sequence of elementary segments, (2) elaborating the appropriate set of rhetorical relations and the criteria for their textual identification. Since both lines were in focus of consideration in [24], it would be superfluous to discuss them here again. It is sufficient to characterize the main results of the adaptation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, these criteria are language-specific because textual markers of relations use the lexical, syntactical, pragmatical, and prosodical means of a language. The elaborated criteria for analyzing poetic texts [24] is substantially based on the parallels between RST schemas and formulae of propositional logic proposed in [31]. These formulae use the notion of relational proposition introduced by the authors of RST [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation